I don't disagree with you, either with your points or (probably) regarding Trump.Are we still concerned about the mental health of the elderly or is that just so 2024 ?
I think the problem with Trump is that what we are seeing isn't because of a decline.I see President Bonespurs couldn't believe it when Biden appointed Powell as Fed Chair.
Spoiler alert - Trump appointed Powell in 2018.
Are we still concerned about the mental health of the elderly or is that just so 2024 ?
Remember, he's keeping us safe and healthy.who knew such a thing might happen if you put an anti-vax nutjob in charge of the nation's public health. but hey, i'm probably just overreacting
![]()
‘Tremendous uncertainty’ for cancer research as US officials target mRNA vaccines
Amid Trump cuts and state-level backlash, experts worry that progress in messenger RNA vaccines could stallwww.theguardian.com
US set to destroy 500 tons of taxpayer-funded emergency food
The high-energy, nutrient-dense biscuits have been sitting for months in a warehouse in Dubai, according to a former USAID official.
Now, because they expire this month, they will have to be destroyed – at an extra $100,000 charge to the American taxpayers.
The former official, who spoke anonymously to discuss the details, said the destruction of the critically needed food would not have happened prior to the Trump administration’s destruction of the US Agency for International Development.
US set to destroy 500 tons of taxpayer-funded emergency food
It appears - based on at least a few things - that MAYBE (I hesitate).....maybe he's finally found the line he cannot cross with this. It may depend, as I read yesterday, on whether it's true that "just because talk show hosts are talking about something (in this case Trump's support imploding) doesn't mean the average person is" or not.Based on past history of the sycophants, a week from now we wont hear another word about Epstein and we will have moved on, with no resolution, to something else.![]()
Every couch in the Oval Office would cringe.The GOP needs to do what the Democrats did not do: throw their leader overboard and put their VP in place to attempt the party rebuild. Release the files, take the hit. If Trump's name isn't on this "list," he's in the clear forever. If it is, you can start your "law and order" rebuild and make an example of him.
g.
maybe he will rescue us from the hellish tyranny of seed oils next /sRemember, he's keeping us safe and healthy.
maybe he will rescue us from the hellish tyranny of seed oils next /s
I’d take Hugh Freeze winning a National Championship over this any day.The GOP needs to do what the Democrats did not do: throw their leader overboard and put their VP in place to attempt the party rebuild. Release the files, take the hit. If Trump's name isn't on this "list," he's in the clear forever. If it is, you can start your "law and order" rebuild and make an example of him.
If Trump is on a list and he may be I don't know, and no one is taking my calls at the DOJ, why wasn't that information given during the Biden administration? That would sink him in my opinion. It doesn't make any sense to hold on to that.It appears - based on at least a few things - that MAYBE (I hesitate).....maybe he's finally found the line he cannot cross with this. It may depend, as I read yesterday, on whether it's true that "just because talk show hosts are talking about something (in this case Trump's support imploding) doesn't mean the average person is" or not.
The GOP needs to do what the Democrats did not do: throw their leader overboard and put their VP in place to attempt the party rebuild. Release the files, take the hit. If Trump's name isn't on this "list," he's in the clear forever. If it is, you can start your "law and order" rebuild and make an example of him.
And no, folks, the base isn't going to stay home and they aren't going to vote for Democrat X in 2028 out of spite. Vance MIGHT - I say might - gain more than he would lose with the swing voters.
The problem, of course, is that they've been handed course correction instruments many times and they always cower at the Orange Ape who literally has never been tough about anything.
Let's not be hasty here.I’d take Hugh Freeze winning a National Championship over this any day.
Maybe because Bill Clinton is on it, too? Or that it might blowback onto Hunter or someone else?If Trump is on a list and he may be I don't know, and no one is taking my calls at the DOJ, why wasn't that information given during the Biden administration?
What's funny is there's a veneer in this question when it's asked by most (no reflection on you) that Trump is some victim of political persecution blah blah blah. He isn't. He's a whiny little witch, a toddler with a title, the poster child for why birth control should be covered by health plans.That would sink him in my opinion. It doesn't make any sense to hold on to that.
Trump's narcissism again prevails.I'll go full conspiracy theory and wonder if there is a list who else is on it that would cause them to not go after Trump? I know how that sounds, but I've got a little conspiracy theorist blood in me that I try to keep under control.
The big potential problem is that MAGA was built on grievance beginning with Obama's birth certificate. All of his supporters have been motivated by a continuous diet of Hunter's laptop, Hillary's and other Democrat's child trafficking ring and of course the Epstein files. What he is attempting to do is to take away a key grievance from his trained followers. He is putting himself in a tight spot!It appears - based on at least a few things - that MAYBE (I hesitate).....maybe he's finally found the line he cannot cross with this. It may depend, as I read yesterday, on whether it's true that "just because talk show hosts are talking about something (in this case Trump's support imploding) doesn't mean the average person is" or not.
The GOP needs to do what the Democrats did not do: throw their leader overboard and put their VP in place to attempt the party rebuild. Release the files, take the hit. If Trump's name isn't on this "list," he's in the clear forever. If it is, you can start your "law and order" rebuild and make an example of him.
And no, folks, the base isn't going to stay home and they aren't going to vote for Democrat X in 2028 out of spite. Vance MIGHT - I say might - gain more than he would lose with the swing voters.
The problem, of course, is that they've been handed course correction instruments many times and they always cower at the Orange Ape who literally has never been tough about anything.
I think it's a case of mutually-assured destruction. Epstein had a lot of friends, both Democrat and Republican.If Trump is on a list and he may be I don't know, and no one is taking my calls at the DOJ, why wasn't that information given during the Biden administration? That would sink him in my opinion. It doesn't make any sense to hold on to that.
I'll go full conspiracy theory and wonder if there is a list who else is on it that would cause them to not go after Trump? I know how that sounds, but I've got a little conspiracy theorist blood in me that I try to keep under control.
This is not even close to being a conspiracy theory; it's common sense and observation. And since both sides (DRINK!) are full of sanctimonious skid-marks, it should come as no surprise that everyone is calling for the release of this spreadsheet of dates/times/customer name that does and does not exist. I shall call this phenomenon Schrödinger's Perv List.If Trump is on a list and he may be I don't know, and no one is taking my calls at the DOJ, why wasn't that information given during the Biden administration? That would sink him in my opinion. It doesn't make any sense to hold on to that.
I'll go full conspiracy theory and wonder if there is a list who else is on it that would cause them to not go after Trump? I know how that sounds, but I've got a little conspiracy theorist blood in me that I try to keep under control.