No. You know darn good and well the headlines would be “Slow Start for Tide” “High Octane Tide Sputters” “Is the Tide Out?” “Tide Misses Speedy Waddle” and on and onIf Bama wins 34-10 (as Clemson did) is that considered a thrashing or thumping? I’ve seen the Tigers’ win called that over and over..
Exactly. The double speak irritates me.No. You know darn good and well the headlines would be “Slow Start for Tide” “High Octane Tide Sputters” “Is the Tide Out?” “Tide Misses Speedy Waddle” and on and on
This would concern me.If Bama wins 34-10 (as Clemson did) is that considered a thrashing or thumping? I’ve seen the Tigers’ win called that over and over..
Sure, I’m not saying it wouldn’t concern me. I’m looking at the two-sidedness of how we perform against a common opponent of Clemson’s.This would concern me.
34-10:Exactly. The double speak irritates me.
Not Stephen A. He’s all in on Bama and CNS! But you absolutely put in Wilbon or Kornheiser who seem to use Clempson and Trevor Lawrence mentions in lieu of ED medicine.34-10:
“Tide survives close win, prompting fresh demands by Dabo Swinney for qualified competition in championship game”
“Clemson: The Greatest Team in Sports History? This Head Coach says so.”
“Tide squeaks past Notre Dame in semifinal; championship game in doubt”
“Is Alabama overrated? Steven A. Smith’s SHOCKING prediction for championship game”
“How Disney movie Safety predicted Alabama’s close win against Notre Dame before championship loss to Clemson”
Haha, thanks. I get my commentators mixed up often.Not Stephen A. He’s all in on Bama and CNS! But you absolutely put Wilbon or Kornheiser who seem to use Clempson and Trevor Lawrence mentions in lieu of ED medicine.