I like this breakdown. He’s using the Torvik rating for his chart.
I especially like the contrast he draws between, for example, Bama and Houston.
Houston , great floor, low ceiling.
Bama, lower floor, but higher ceiling.
So in essence a team like Houston is going to obliterate lesser opponents, but against the Auburns and Dukes of the world would lose more often than not.
Meanwhile Alabama may lose to a lesser opponent, but when they’re on could obliterate an Auburn or Duke type opponent.
I especially like the contrast he draws between, for example, Bama and Houston.
Houston , great floor, low ceiling.
Bama, lower floor, but higher ceiling.
So in essence a team like Houston is going to obliterate lesser opponents, but against the Auburns and Dukes of the world would lose more often than not.
Meanwhile Alabama may lose to a lesser opponent, but when they’re on could obliterate an Auburn or Duke type opponent.
