I am tangentially in the academic market and the market is quite flooded. At a southern public state university not long ago, they advertised for a tenure track history professor position and they got 300 applicants who already had their PhDs in hand. A friend of mine who got his PhD at USCe and is one of the sharpest historians I know of the Early Republic. He is teaching at a private high school.
It is a really flooded market.
A teacher of mine (who got his PhD at Kansas) told me something. really insightful that turned out to be true:
There is a pecking order in American academia and everyone is aware of it. Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Penn, continuing to Tejas, UVA, Duke, Vandy, UGA and then continuing to the Alabama's of the world, and then onwards from there to Ole Miss, directional schools, etc.. My professor said, "You can teach down but you cannot teach up. You can earn a PhD from Harvard and teach at UVA, but you cannot earn a PhD at UVa and teach at Harvard (unless you are the world's most respected expect on some niche Harvard is looking for or meet the right demographics) Thinking back to the faculty at Alabama, and where they got their PhDs, this is what I remember: Yale, Princeton, Brown, UVa, UVa, Michigan, LSU. Look at the faculty at Harvard and you will not find an Alabama grad there.
I am not in that market. I have a unique set of attributes most academics do not have, but if I were in the market, it would be grim. (And that has little to do with the state of the economy. One of the desirable things about working in academia is that it is generally recession-proof.)