I'm curious as to what means the ECHR has to enforce its dictates.i saw this recently and found it worth listening to.
Katja Hoyer, historian originally from the former DDR, and a book about the DDR called Beyond the Wall, speaks about the current climate in Germany.
German ask why the current problems cannot be fixed and I lay a lot of it at the feet of policies adopted by unelected EU officials, especially the European Court of Human Rights, which is an unconstitutional, unelected court that runs roughshod over the democratic mechanisms that are equipped to address the issues driving disaffection. The ECHR tells the peoples of European states, "screw you citizens, when you erected this court system, you abdicated any democratic control over your country. Now stew in our ex cathedra dclarations. We don't care what you want."
Erecting a court separate from and parallel to the normal court system is highly inflammatory and destabilizing because the body of law they enforce is so vague and undefined. The concept of "human rights" law is doing much the same thing in Canada.
What happens if Germany (or any other country) tells the ECHR to pound sand? Can the ECHR do anything? If so, what?
