There are fewer representations of Nick Saban's greatness at Alabama that are better than this one.
They were on and off several times. Largest drop was around 1960.I liked seeing Auburn fall off the page like a rock around 1990![]()
I do not have a Twitter account but when I click the link it allows me to view the item. If I try to view comments or do anything else I get a pop up that says that I must open an account.Is there anyway to fix this for those of us who do not have Twitter and cannot access the site?
Our school has all twitter blocked.I do not have a Twitter account but when I click the link it allows me to view the item. If I try to view comments or do anything else I get a pop up that says that I must open an account.
The reason that Alabama had 6 NC seasons but only 31 appearances as number 1 pre-Saban was that in 3 of the 6, Bama did not appear even once as number 1. In fact, even in the other 3 Bama did not dominate the number 1 slot. And the non-NC years Bama rarely appeared as number 1 even though they were frequently number 2-5.We went from 31 to 138 under Saban. Unbelievable.
Program | AP NC Seasons with 0 weeks as #1 | Total AP NCs | NC Seasons with 0 weeks as #1 | % NC Seasons (x of 86) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 5 | 12 | 64, 65, 92, 11, 15 | 14.0 |
Miami | 3 | 5 | 83, 87, 89 | 5.8 |
Notre Dame | 3 | 8 | 46, 73, 77 | 9.3 |
Clemson | 2 | 3 | 15, 18 | 3.5 |
Ohio State | 2 | 5 | 02, 14 | 5.8 |
Penn State | 2 | 2 | 82, 86 | 2.3 |
Florida | 1 | 3 | 06 | 3.5 |
Texas | 1 | 3 | 05 | 3.5 |
Nebraska | 1 | 4 | 70 | 4.7 |
It really demonstrates an enormous bias against Alabama. It's how the 1992 season went as well. They had to beat Miami before most people would even consider the possibility that Alabama was better. Now, I'm not saying it was unfair Miami was ranked ahead, but it seems like it always went that way, kind of like how until Saban Alabama has zero Heisman winners despite some amazing football players.The reason that Alabama had 6 NC seasons but only 31 appearances as number 1 pre-Saban was that in 3 of the 6, Bama did not appear even once as number 1. In fact, even in the other 3 Bama did not dominate the number 1 slot. And the non-NC years Bama rarely appeared as number 1 even though they were frequently number 2-5.
There have been 5 seasons where Bama has finished #1 with no other weeks at #1. That is 25% of the total number of 20 seasons out of 86 where this happened.
Program AP NC Seasons with
0 weeks as #1Total AP NCs NC Seasons
with 0 weeks as #1% NC Seasons
(x of 86)Alabama 5 1264, 65, 92, 11, 15 14.0Miami 3 583, 87, 89 5.8Notre Dame 3 846, 73, 77 9.3Clemson 2 315, 18 3.5Ohio State 2 502, 14 5.8Penn State 2 282, 86 2.3Florida 1 306 3.5Texas 1 305 3.5Nebraska 1 470 4.7
And 19 of those 31 appearances were in 1978-79-80.The reason that Alabama had 6 NC seasons but only 31 appearances as number 1 pre-Saban was that in 3 of the 6, Bama did not appear even once as number 1.
A few points of note:In fact, even in the other 3 Bama did not dominate the number 1 slot. And the non-NC years Bama rarely appeared as number 1 even though they were frequently number 2-5.
There have been 5 seasons where Bama has finished #1 with no other weeks at #1. That is 25% of the total number of 20 seasons out of 86 where this happened.
Program AP NC Seasons with
0 weeks as #1Total AP NCs NC Seasons
with 0 weeks as #1% NC Seasons
(x of 86)Alabama 5 1264, 65, 92, 11, 15 14.0Miami 3 583, 87, 89 5.8Notre Dame 3 846, 73, 77 9.3Clemson 2 315, 18 3.5Ohio State 2 502, 14 5.8Penn State 2 282, 86 2.3Florida 1 306 3.5Texas 1 305 3.5Nebraska 1 470 4.7
TideFans may receive compensation if you purchase from Pit Boss.