Personally, he should have broken his neck and killed him.
http://www.news-journalonline.com/article/20140718/news/140719489?tc=ar
http://www.news-journalonline.com/article/20140718/news/140719489?tc=ar
This works too. I doubt I could convict anyone of murder or manslaughter for this. I'd probably hang the jury.
I guarantee you that there is a lawyer talking to the child molester and moving forward with plans to sue the father. That's the current nature of that profession.A father's job (one of them, anyway) is to protect his family. This father was doing exactly what he was supposed to do. Put the perp in jail and let all the other inmates know what he's "in for" :wink:.
The lawyer should be shot along with the child molester.I guarantee you that there is a lawyer talking to the child molester and moving forward with plans to sue the father. That's the current nature of that profession.
I remember that well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Plauche
To a certain degree, that voice was right. His son would be tormented with fear knowing that Doucet was alive and "could" possibly abuse him again. So, he did the only thing he knew he could do to silence both that voice and alleviate his son's fear. Double bonus. Son has a better chance of recovering and the state doesn't have to "rehabilitate" a pervert.I remember that well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Plauche
. Although Plauche shot and killed Doucet, he was given five years probation for the shooting and received no jail time. The case received wide publicity due to the fact that many people questioned whether Plauche should be charged for murder or be let off. Plauche claims to believe to this day that he was in the right, and that those in a similar position would have done the same thing.[SUP][1]
Psychological reports helped Plauche's case after it was learned that Doucet had abused Jody Plauche months prior to the kidnapping. Dr. Edward P. Uzee examined Gary Plauche and determined that he could not tell the difference between right and wrong when he killed Doucet. A voice inside Plauche's head was telling him that he had to kill Doucet or he would continue to abuse and harm his son
[/SUP]
Lawyer should get same punishment as the molester. Seriously. If you want to sue a man who protected his innocent child from a predator and even restrained himself in doing so... Saul Goodman has a higher moral standard.I guarantee you that there is a lawyer talking to the child molester and moving forward with plans to sue the father. That's the current nature of that profession.
Exactly...... Save the taxpayers and court/prison system's time on the case. A State paid funeral is cheaper than housing this sick individual..... Then there's always the chance of a bleeding heart juror that would let him off on the grounds of the "beyond reasonable doubt" argument. If more accused sicko's were treated in this manner, then maybe other "closet pervs" might think twice before they act on their sick fantasies......To a certain degree, that voice was right. His son would be tormented with fear knowing that Doucet was alive and "could" possibly abuse him again. So, he did the only thing he knew he could do to silence both that voice and alleviate his son's fear. Double bonus. Son has a better chance of recovering and the state doesn't have to "rehabilitate" a pervert.
Saul will help to protect and launder the money of a major kingpin in the meth trade, but by God he's got his morals!!!!!Lawyer should get same punishment as the molester. Seriously. If you want to sue a man who protected his innocent child from a predator and even restrained himself in doing so... Saul Goodman has a higher moral standard.