Thought of another unintended consequence of today's insanity: Elimination of men's non-revenue / "Olympic" sports programs. Here's my logic:
Given the money taken up by pay-for-play, exacerbated by the freedom to transfer anywhere at essentially any time (and the ensuing bidding wars for the transfers), there just won't be enough money to go around. So programs will have to start justifying themselves.
Football generates a bunch of money, so it won't be eliminated anywhere. Problem is, it's all men.
That's a problem because Title IX requires that men’s and women’s scholarships be equal in number and value.
So non-revenue women's sports are safe because the colleges need the women's scholarships to offset football eating up 85 on the men’s side.
Now suppose you're a college whose Athletic Department is hemorrhaging money because of pay-for-play. You can't cut football because it's the engine that drives everything. You can't cut women's sports because the feds would be ALL up in your business about a nanosecond after the decision.
So what do you cut?
You cut men's sports that lose money. Which is all of them except football and (sometimes, at some colleges) basketball.
Without a huge injection of sanity, baseball, men's tennis, men's golf, men's track & field, and men's swimming could be looking at the guillotine.
I don't know the male / female scholarship breakout in Adaptive Sports. But given the political sensitivity, I'm guessing the feds would give men's adaptive sports a pass.