Trump deeds and misdeeds VII

[NationalTitles18]

In 1934, a certain German's back taxes and any new taxes were cancelled because of his constitutional position. He was declared above the law.

Trump wants complete criminal immunity because of his former constitutional position. He wants to be declared above the law and promises to be a dictator on day one.

 

[NationalTitles18]

That certain German also did not take any pay from his office because he said he had his own source of income. Donated the salary to former soldiers. Hmmm...

 

[Huckleberry]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786958013900718558

Donald Trump: “Democrats are the radical ones on this position because they support abortion up to and even beyond the ninth month…The baby is executed after birth is unacceptable, and almost everyone agrees with that.”

 

[Bamaro]

The orange moron was found to be in contempt this morning for the 10th time. I think he has pushed the judge into a corner, probally on purpose, and tI think he will have to throw his fat butt in jail the next time. I wonder if he will be strip searched and have a cavity search?

 

[jthomas666]

He's daring the judge to jail him, figuring that it will gain him extra martyr points and thus extra fundraising from the rubes. I don't care if it does just that--enough's enough. SOMEONE has to stand up and say that Trump is not above the law (and we know it ain't gonna be the Supreme Court).

Would kind of like to see him get jailed over the weekend...so he will have enough time to think it over.

 

[Bazza]

Wrt to contempt stuff......the expression "The dog is about to catch the car" comes to mind!

I think the judge has been very patient and has bent over backwards here.

But I also think this whole prosecution is more about politics than any kind of justice so take that for what it's worth.

I also think the judge is better off just issuing fines than any kind of jail stuff. We'll see......

 

[Go Bama]

But I also think this whole prosecution is more about politics than any kind of justice so take that for what it's worth.

Then let me ask you this. Irrespective of politics, if Trump is guilty of a crime, should he be prosecuted?

 

[Bazza]

Then let me ask you this. Irrespective of politics, if Trump is guilty of a crime, should he be prosecuted?

I think he should, Joe............as long as we apply the same equally to ALL who commit crimes.

-----------------

We see people who commit crimes every day and not get charged.

From what I have heard....the Feds elected not to charge Trump in this one, so.....not sure Bragg should have.

Not a big deal to me as this is the world we live in now.

Thanks!

 

[TIDE-HSV]

Then let me ask you this. Irrespective of politics, if Trump is guilty of a crime, should he be prosecuted?

The prosecutions of this crime number in the thousands in NY, over 11K in the last ten years alone...

 

[92tide]

trump has gotten due process and leeway and deference that no one else would get, and in an absurd fashion. it's silly to think he is some sort of victim

 

[jthomas666]

I also think the judge is better off just issuing fines than any kind of jail stuff. We'll see......

Because the fines have been so effective?

 

[NationalTitles18]

But I also think this whole prosecution is more about politics than any kind of justice so take that for what it's worth.

I'm curious if you think the same of all the charges against him, federal and state.

 

[Huckleberry]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787641543441932415

The MN GOP just announced today that Donald Trump’s campaign believes that MN is in play and he will now be the keynote speaker at their Lincoln Day dinner on May 17. But that also happens to be the same night as Barron’s graduation.

 

[jthomas666]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787873157581271041

Wonder what would have happened if she had replied, " 'Briefly' pretty much covers it."

 

[TIDE-HSV]

I don't really understand the grounds for objection, TBF. Maybe prejudicial...

 

[jthomas666]

I don't really understand the grounds for objection, TBF. Maybe prejudicial...

They went so far as to move for a mistrial, stating that it was prejudicial.

Regardless of the reason, I suspect we're all happier that the objection was sustained.

 

[Bamaro]

They went so far as to move for a mistrial, stating that it was prejudicial.

Regardless of the reason, I suspect we're all happier that the objection was sustained.

Moves for mistrial are SOP so an appeal can be launched later.

 

[Go Bama]

I don't really understand the grounds for objection, TBF. Maybe prejudicial...

Irrelevant??? She established they were having sex. A play by play should be unnecessary.

 

[Chukker Veteran]

Irrelevant??? She established they were having sex. A play by play should be unnecessary.

I think one reason they squeezed so many details into her testimony was to lend credibility to her story, as Trump seems to simply claim the hookup never happened.

 

[TIDE-HSV]

Irrelevant??? She established they were having sex. A play by play should be unnecessary.

Probably. He decided the prejudicial aspect outweighed any probative value...