I added in the things that we DO know. Namely, that he identified the boy as black when he called the police, and that he refused to comply with the police when they told him to back off. So, to him, race was important, and his decision to continue the "pursuit" when told to back off led to the death of an innocent boy. IMO, you have to stretch to come to a different conclusion.You have a strange view of causation, bigotry, and murder if you reach that conclusion about this set of hypothetical facts.