I think Oregon would hang 60 on us or OSU. They might give up some scores, but I think they win by 30 over either team.
Alabama fans, my wife included, seemed to believe that Alabama would steam-roll the Buckeyes. The thought was that Alabama was the best team in the country and that OSU was lucky to even get into the field of four given the weakness of the conference. To take that a step further - Alabama, as the best team in the SEC (the best conference in college football) must be the best team in college football. And Ohio State, the best team in the B1G (one of the weakest conferences in college football), was simply not very good. They were only in because of their weak schedule. Translation - Alabama wins BIG if they play well, but still wins a tight game if they don't.
What you think you learned - since Ohio State was a weak team (in your opinion) and they beat Alabama, Alabama must also be a weak team and they would have no chance against a "great" team like Oregon. What I learned was different. I learned that the Buckeyes are better than we thought they were. My opinion of Alabama was not diminished in the game, but my opinion of OSU went up. My opinion of Oregon did not change as I expected them to expose FSU (and they did).
I still do not know how good Oregon is. We will find out in a week. But I still feel that Alabama had the most talented team in the playoffs, and that you would probably beat any team if you were still playing next week - including us.
These teams are comprised of players, and the players are human beings. They have good days and bad days, just like the rest of us. This is true in every sport, at every level of competition. We were the better team when we played last week. I am very happy about that. But I am not confused by it. That does not make us the better team over-all.
I like our chances against Oregon, just as I would like your chances against Oregon. We are both bigger, stronger and faster than they are across the board. As I said, I could be wrong, but until I see it evidenced on the field, I remain ever the optimist.
I'll answer this when I see how Ohio State does against them. Basically...
If Ohio State beats them by 2 scores or more, yeah we would have beaten the Ducks. Handily.
If Oregon wipes the floor with Ohio State, ain't nobody beating the Ducks.
Still, if you think about it, the pressure is on the Ducks. When the pressure is on, they don't always seem to do so well. Not a knock on them. They're still the best team so far.
Alabama has a very weak secondary. Consistent failure on 3rd and long is a recipe for a loss. I thought the best team won the other night and my opinion of Alabama diminished. Bama is still a really good team deserving of the playoffs, but if they replayed the Sugar Bowl I'd expect tOSU to win.Alabama fans, my wife included, seemed to believe that Alabama would steam-roll the Buckeyes. The thought was that Alabama was the best team in the country and that OSU was lucky to even get into the field of four given the weakness of the conference. To take that a step further - Alabama, as the best team in the SEC (the best conference in college football) must be the best team in college football. And Ohio State, the best team in the B1G (one of the weakest conferences in college football), was simply not very good. They were only in because of their weak schedule. Translation - Alabama wins BIG if they play well, but still wins a tight game if they don't.
What you think you learned - since Ohio State was a weak team (in your opinion) and they beat Alabama, Alabama must also be a weak team and they would have no chance against a "great" team like Oregon. What I learned was different. I learned that the Buckeyes are better than we thought they were. My opinion of Alabama was not diminished in the game, but my opinion of OSU went up. My opinion of Oregon did not change as I expected them to expose FSU (and they did).
I still do not know how good Oregon is. We will find out in a week. But I still feel that Alabama had the most talented team in the playoffs, and that you would probably beat any team if you were still playing next week - including us.
These teams are comprised of players, and the players are human beings. They have good days and bad days, just like the rest of us. This is true in every sport, at every level of competition. We were the better team when we played last week. I am very happy about that. But I am not confused by it. That does not make us the better team over-all.
I like our chances against Oregon, just as I would like your chances against Oregon. We are both bigger, stronger and faster than they are across the board. As I said, I could be wrong, but until I see it evidenced on the field, I remain ever the optimist.
I'm not so sure about that. MIZZ is ranked 95th on total offense, so that wasn't a big challenge for our defense, but we gave up 428 yards to MSU, 630 to AU, and 537 to OSU. The biggest difference is that OSU is ranked 17th total defense, AU is ranked 64th and MSU is ranked 85th.
We gave up 1990 yards and 128 points (497.5 YPG and 32 PPG) to four top 25 offenses we faced this year (WVU, MSU, AU and OSU). Luckily for us, OSU is the only one that had a top 25 defense.
That is a hard fact to swallow, but it is a fact...
Alabama fans, my wife included, seemed to believe that Alabama would steam-roll the Buckeyes. The thought was that Alabama was the best team in the country and that OSU was lucky to even get into the field of four given the weakness of the conference. To take that a step further - Alabama, as the best team in the SEC (the best conference in college football) must be the best team in college football. And Ohio State, the best team in the B1G (one of the weakest conferences in college football), was simply not very good. They were only in because of their weak schedule. Translation - Alabama wins BIG if they play well, but still wins a tight game if they don't.
What you think you learned - since Ohio State was a weak team (in your opinion) and they beat Alabama, Alabama must also be a weak team and they would have no chance against a "great" team like Oregon. What I learned was different. I learned that the Buckeyes are better than we thought they were. My opinion of Alabama was not diminished in the game, but my opinion of OSU went up. My opinion of Oregon did not change as I expected them to expose FSU (and they did).
I still do not know how good Oregon is. We will find out in a week. But I still feel that Alabama had the most talented team in the playoffs, and that you would probably beat any team if you were still playing next week - including us.
These teams are comprised of players, and the players are human beings. They have good days and bad days, just like the rest of us. This is true in every sport, at every level of competition. We were the better team when we played last week. I am very happy about that. But I am not confused by it. That does not make us the better team over-all.
I like our chances against Oregon, just as I would like your chances against Oregon. We are both bigger, stronger and faster than they are across the board. As I said, I could be wrong, but until I see it evidenced on the field, I remain ever the optimist.
Alabama has a very weak secondary. Consistent failure on 3rd and long is a recipe for a loss. I thought the best team won the other night and my opinion of Alabama diminished. Bama is still a really good team deserving of the playoffs, but if they replayed the Sugar Bowl I'd expect tOSU to win.
I agree 100%.we were outcoached and outplayed...something that hasn't happened often under saban and it's just a tough pill to swallow.
it's strange too, because over the season as a whole, i think saban and company did their best coaching job at the capstone.
Is it wrong that I think we would have handled Mariota very well, made that offense very one dimensionall and handled buisness just fine?