The reason is they are liberals. I wonder why he felt the need to include Obama’s middle name.Basically just a list of people the guy doesn't like for whatever reason.
There have been, in American history, many people who were more destructive than any of these people.
You get an extra Werther’s original slipped under your pillow by the MAGA fairy.do i get something special if i forward this to everyone in my email contact list?
I would fit Dick Cheney into the top 5.1. Donald Trump
2. Newt Gingrich
3. Joseph McCarthy
4. Richard Nixon
5. Lyndon Johnson
6. Bill Clinton
7. Mitch McConnell
8. Nancy Pelosi
9. George Wallace
10.
I am still thinking about #10, but will say this list is fluid except for numbers 1 and 2.
ETA: I have not been around for 8 decades.
FIFYI would fit Dick Cheney into the top 5.
Throw Hillary Clinton in the top 10 or dishonorable mention. For merely choosing personal gain over country. She should have known her negatives outweighed her positives and should have just threw in the towel before the nomination process.
And Hillary Clinton (again). Simply for helping elect Trump.
the primaries weren't rigged and bernie would have been massacred in a head to head race with trump.FIFY
You and others might hate it, but if he beats Hillary like he would have if the primary hadn’t been rigged by her machine, every poll in existence had him beating Trump by 8-12 points.
Blaming him for Trump is akin to Trump taking credit every time the stock market goes up; it’s flat out bogus.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Remember Hillary was up 7-10 points and lost. In a head to head Bernie could have possibly done better, but he would have still lost. The reality is that Americans were not ready for someone like Bernie, George McGovern or Eugene McCarthy.the primaries weren't rigged and bernie would have been massacred in a head to head race with trump.
very little negative information was out there about bernie during the primaries. he had a lot of "momentum" because he was not hillary (policy wise, they weren't that far apart) and a lot of the narratives that were being pushed were "championing" bernie in order to make hillary look bad. that stuff would have stopped immediately had he won the primaries and he would have been absolutely raked over the coals. he couldn't even win the primary against "the worstest presidential candidate ever" and was never even close.Remember Hillary was up 7-10 points and lost. In a head to head Bernie could have possibly done better, but he would have still lost. The reality is that Americans were not ready for someone like Bernie, George McGovern or Eugene McCarthy.
The people who cry about the primaries being rigged forget that Bernie was incredibly popular in the caucuses. Caucuses are nothing but chaos, masquerading as a democratic process. People shouting and yelling. Operatives pack the place to push the totals up. I went thru the 2008 and 2012 caucuses, and found them loathesome.FIFY
You and others might hate it, but if he beats Hillary like he would have if the primary hadn’t been rigged by her machine, every poll in existence had him beating Trump by 8-12 points.
Blaming him for Trump is akin to Trump taking credit every time the stock market goes up; it’s flat out bogus.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk