LOL!
You using that phrase reminds me of a Greek professor I once had who, when discussing an elementary subject, would use the phrase "That's Greek to me!" to indicate its simplicity.
:biggrin2:
Well that was to distinguish between mind-boggling insanity like Paul Hornung winning it while playing for a 2-8 team.
If the argument is, "Well, which player contributed more to this team's success" (aka the RG3 over Trent argument), then it doesn't matter that Hornung scored all those points because he played for a 2-8 mediocrity.
Proving my point again since he played for Notre Darn.
I didn't live through that because I wasn't born yet. The most egregious one I ever saw firsthand, though, was Herschel Walker getting snubbed in 1980 because "well, he's only a freshman." My point was that I'm sure there were insane Heisman selections prior to 1980, I just recall those quite vividly.
Neither Ingram nor Henry was a BAD choice, but I'm not 100% certain either was "really" the "best player," that's all I'm saying. George Rogers in 1980 was not a "bad" choice, but he only got the award because he was a senior and Herschel was a freshman, and Rogers led the nation in rushing on an obscure 8-3 team.
The best player in 1980 was probably Walker, but I wouldn't have been too upset if Jim McMahon, who threw 47 TDs (an insane total back then) and for over 4,500 yards, won it. Both of those totals exceed Kyler Murray's numbers from last year during the modern era of Big 12 flag football.
And the reality is that if Walker had been on USC or Oklahoma - instead of Georgia - and had an unbeaten season then he very likely (even in that primitive day of "this is an award for juniors and seniors") would have won it. But playing for Jawja? Oh, those numbers don't matter.
Walker as a freshman (for those who didn't see him) was Bo Jackson or Cam Newton at their absolute best. Pick the five best all-around players you ever saw in the history of CFB.....and Walker (unless you're 70 or older) has to be one of them.