Among all coaches who were candidates, probably Croom would have better for the program though i doubt he would have won more
If we had hired Sylvester Croom as head coach, just imagine the fallout and bad press we would have gotten when we fired him, which is how that was going to end.
"Alabama, the state where George Wallace stood in the doorway to prevent blacks from attending a mere 40 years ago, today stood in the doorway of advancement again by firing a black coach whom they hired after suffering the second most crippling probation in NCAA history and not giving him a fair chance, leaving him with a decimated team and demanding immediate results. Nothing has changed in Alabama since blah blah blah."
That's what would have happened. Let's be honest: MSU only hired him because they were in the crosshairs of an NZAA investigation and could say, "We'll hire the dude if you'll go lightly on us."
I watched "The Sports Reporters" try to say - and they literally did say - "Alabama should have done the right thing," which to them was hire Croom. Why was this "the right thing?" Well, you know their reasoning on that. Notre Dame had hired Willingham - and amazingly enough, they were savaging Notre Dame "because they only did the right thing after they learned O'Leary lied on his resume." Again - why is "hire the guy on the basis of his race THE RIGHT THING?"
My take in 2003?
"Look, we're probably going to go through this again in 4-5 years. Hire Shula because you're gonna get 1/3 the grief when he gets fired you're gonna get for firing Croom."
I liked Croom until he became a petulant child at MSU over not getting the job here.