Keelon Russell may be the next great one. Then again he may not. We’ve seen a number of “can’t miss†prospects do just that - miss.
I want an open and fair competition among all them. And the best earns the nod. If you can’t separate the three, then IMO the job (at least initially) goes to Ty or Austin. Commitment has to mean something. If “all world†Arch Manning can sit behind Quinn Ewers for two years with only limited spot playing or certain packages, then so can Russell.
I am now way past this notion of the “coronation†of player and handing them the keys to kingdom out of fear they “may transfer†or making promises to keep them. I’m no longer about the guy that may leave. I’m a fan of those that choose to stay.
So let me be clear -if Russell is clearly the best option as a true freshman, so be it. Start him. But if Ty or Austin offers better chances to win, then they get the nod.