Wisconsin sues UMiami for contract interference in player transfer kerfuffle.

BamaNation

Publisher and Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Apr 9, 1999
22,719
20,962
432
Silicon Slopes
TideFans.com

Here’s hoping the Badgers win and it begins to put some enforceable sanity back into this thing.

hope they win and player is declared ineligible for this season.
 

4Q Basket Case

FB|BB Moderator
Staff member
Nov 8, 2004
10,559
15,898
337
Tuscaloosa
Excellent move by the Badgers. I hadn't considered this angle. It might mean that going forward, all pay-for-play contracts will be for four years. I'm also guessing that schools will start including buyout clauses in the case of transfer and enforcing them.

Or, as the cynic in the back of my mind is telling me, it might just mean they get better at covering up tampering.
 

AlexanderFan

Hall of Fame
Jul 23, 2004
13,008
10,587
287
Birmingham
Excellent move by the Badgers. I hadn't considered this angle. It might mean that going forward, all pay-for-play contracts will be for four years. I'm also guessing that schools will start including buyout clauses in the case of transfer and enforcing them.

Or, as the cynic in the back of my mind is telling me, it might just mean they get better at covering up tampering.
However, according to several contracts between Big Ten schools and their players that ESPN has previously reviewed, these deals explicitly state that athletes are not being paid to play football for the university. Since the school is technically paying only to use the player's NIL rights, it's not clear if a judge will consider it fair to enforce a part of the contract that dictates where the player attends school.

Here’s the loophole
 

Joefus

All-SEC
Jan 3, 2021
1,417
1,388
187
However, according to several contracts between Big Ten schools and their players that ESPN has previously reviewed, these deals explicitly state that athletes are not being paid to play football for the university. Since the school is technically paying only to use the player's NIL rights, it's not clear if a judge will consider it fair to enforce a part of the contract that dictates where the player attends school.

Here’s the loophole
Could they sue for all monies paid to his NIL this year? If they had to forfeit that it would be pretty discouraging to people wanting to transfer
 

New Posts

Latest threads