I think what is consistently missing from those people who want Shula to say is an evaluation of the coach. Prove what Shula has done that makes him an excellent coach, and I'll listen.
A better gauge would, I think, be to look at what aspects of the team's play have improved during the last four years.
Play calling--minimal improvement. If Shula could rid himself of an apparent belief that there is a constitutional requirement that he run that freaking draw play on 2nd and long. More troubling is time management. A QB w/ a suspect OL needs as much time as he can get to get set, read the defense, and audible if necessary. That problem was glaringly evident last night,
The play calling close to the end zone has been discussed enough, I think, so I will just mention it and move on. Were it not for this issue, I'd be inclined to rate playcalling a little higher.
OL--Has there been any improvement on the OL in the last four years? The only improvement I've seen is that addition of Andre Smith, and that's a testament to recruiting, not coaching. If anything, this unit has gotten progressivle worse, resulting in a weak line that cannot open running lanes or control defenders trying to get to the QB. I've said it before and I'll say it again--A new OL coach is a must if Shula is going to stay. The OL needs a new direction, and more importantly, a new attitude.
RB--Running backs have been solid throughout the four years. Problems this year are a result of injury and poor line play.
WR--a puzzlement. We've a lot of talent here, but the WR corps doesn't seem to be developing. Sloppy routes, poor hands--that's indicative of poor coaching. If Prothro comes back next year, we could have the best WR corps in the nation--but will it be a result of coaching or raw talent?
QB--Say what you will about his HC skills, but Shula is clearly bringing JPW along well. At times he has perhaps asked too much of a 1st year starter, but the TD to McCall and the bullet thrown to KB on a quick slant show that JPW is making exceptional progress.
DL--They had an off year this year, but they've been solid over the last four years. I think the DL (and for that matter, the entire team) has suffered from a lack of on field leadership.
LB--There's no question that Kines can coach up LBs. We've had problems this year, but that was to be expected with the talent we lost.
CB--See LB.
Game management--Some of the stuff we saw yesterday would have been understandable in Shula's first year, but not in his fourth.
Special teams--My heart doesn't stop whenever we field a punt. That is primarily due to graduation, not coaching. They're still inconsistent, and often a liability.
So I count two areas (OL, game management, ST) where there has been no progress or even regression over the last four years.
One other (WR) have show some improvement, but not nearly as much as we need to see.
If Shula is going to stay, he needs a new OL and a new special teams coach. A WR coach might not be a bad idea either, but frankly, making massive changes could send the wrong message. Targeting the major weaknesses will address the major problems, and might also inform the minor weaknesses that they had best step up their games.