Birmingham News SEC predictions

bama_at_uab

1st Team
Mar 6, 2006
901
0
0
Birmingham

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,183
27,863
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
Other teams have just as many or more questions to answer than Bama. In my opinion the two teams that have the biggest questions to answer is LSU and Florida.

LSU
Can this new group of talented players play as well together as the group that just left? Just because you've got talent doesn't automatically translate into team chemistry. They're replacing a first round NFL QB, two NFL WR's, Safety and installing an entirely new offense. If LSU can't find that same chemistry they've got a mighty distance to fall from the pre season number 2/3 ranking. With expectations to play for or win a NC and having to replace NFL caliber talent. Their "questions" are much greater than ours. Remember, nobody is expecting us to do anything better than eight wins.

Florida
Is Tebow the real deal? Will he do what everybody is saying he will do and that's "dominate" the SEC at the qb position? Chris Leak didn't exactly live up to the expectations he had on him when coming out of highschool. Thoughts of multiple heismans were everywhere when he came out of college. Didn't happen. The SEC is too tough for a qb to single handedly dominate. The defense lost a lot of very good players to the NFL. Can they replace them?


Every team will be playing with "questions to answer" and weaknesses. But its the team that is the most prepared and makes the least mental mistakes that usually wins the game. I've watched some of the most talented teams lose to lessor talented teams simply from being unprepared and making mental mistakes. Great physical talent doesn't guarantee you squat.
 

Proxigean Tide

All-SEC
Oct 13, 1999
1,472
0
0
62
Dover, DE
Injuries will dictate how Bama finishes in 2007. However, teams looking for immediate help from incoming freshman shouldn't be overly optimistic. I just hope Bama is better at season's end than it was at the beginning. That would be a good indication that things are going in the right direction.

Prediction: 8-4 and tied with Arkansas for third place finish in west behind LSU and Auburn.
 

red55

All-American
Nov 5, 2002
2,227
2
0
Baton Rouge
Other teams have just as many or more questions to answer than Bama. In my opinion the two teams that have the biggest questions to answer is LSU and Florida.

LSU
Can this new group of talented players play as well together as the group that just left? Just because you've got talent doesn't automatically translate into team chemistry. They're replacing a first round NFL QB, two NFL WR's, Safety and installing an entirely new offense. If LSU can't find that same chemistry they've got a mighty distance to fall from the pre season number 2/3 ranking.
That's a pretty accurate assessment. Still, it is important to start as high as possible, the way the rankings work, since it is a two-team playoff for the crystal football. You can be undefeated in the SEC and ranked #3 and not get in the title game, as Auburn can attest.

If Russell was back for his senior year, I'd be thinking BCS bowl and a shot at a national title. But the offense must gel under Flynn and this could take time that LSU doesn't have, playing Top-10 VT on September 8. If it gels fast, LSU's high pre-season ranking could get them in the title chase at seasons end. If it takes a half-season to gel, LSU could struggle to remain in the top-10.

Fortunately they may not have to score many points to win. LSU's defense has finished #3 nationally for three straight years and this defense is the strongest yet.
 

moorav

Banned
Dec 6, 2006
1,398
0
0
I am very confident - I think we have decent talent and no team on the schedule sticks out to me as being that great.

I think we will have a marvelous season. We have the players & apparently we have the coaches that can motivate them.

Really all we needed last year was better motivation-determination..etc

I honestly think that this year you will have to beat us all four qtrs instead 2 or 3 qtrs. I don't think most of the teams last year could have beat us had we played all 4 qtrs.

I am not ready for summer to be over but looking fwd to the season
 

Vinny

Hall of Fame
Sep 27, 2001
8,244
213
187
57
Rockaway, NJ
I don't see Bama losing more than 4 games. I would not be surprised if they won 9 or more games either.
 

BamaGrad2005

Scout Team
Sep 26, 2005
173
0
35
42
Lexington, KY
That's a pretty accurate assessment. Still, it is important to start as high as possible, the way the rankings work, since it is a two-team playoff for the crystal football. You can be undefeated in the SEC and ranked #3 and not get in the title game, as Auburn can attest.

If Russell was back for his senior year, I'd be thinking BCS bowl and a shot at a national title. But the offense must gel under Flynn and this could take time that LSU doesn't have, playing Top-10 VT on September 8. If it gels fast, LSU's high pre-season ranking could get them in the title chase at seasons end. If it takes a half-season to gel, LSU could struggle to remain in the top-10.

Fortunately they may not have to score many points to win. LSU's defense has finished #3 nationally for three straight years and this defense is the strongest yet.
I couldn't agree more. LSU's defense could carry that team until the offense gets their act together. A few weeks ago I was speaking with a VT grad friend of mine and we both agreed that the LSU-VT game could be really important in deciding the national title game. It will be a must watch.
 

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,183
27,863
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
That's a pretty accurate assessment. Still, it is important to start as high as possible, the way the rankings work, since it is a two-team playoff for the crystal football. You can be undefeated in the SEC and ranked #3 and not get in the title game, as Auburn can attest.

If Russell was back for his senior year, I'd be thinking BCS bowl and a shot at a national title. But the offense must gel under Flynn and this could take time that LSU doesn't have, playing Top-10 VT on September 8. If it gels fast, LSU's high pre-season ranking could get them in the title chase at seasons end. If it takes a half-season to gel, LSU could struggle to remain in the top-10.

Fortunately they may not have to score many points to win. LSU's defense has finished #3 nationally for three straight years and this defense is the strongest yet.
This years defense should be your strongest yet. But they haven't played a game yet. Odds are they will do fine but you won't truly know until the season starts and they show that they picked up where they ended last season and are rolling along.

In today's game depending on a defense to win is some kind of tough to do. Depending a defense to win games means (to bama fans at least) that your offense is sputtering along at 13-16 pts a game. That ain't good bro no matter how good your defense is.

My point is that every team will have "questions" and "weaknesses" that they are going to bring into every game. It's not like Bama is going to be the only team that will go into a game with something "wrong" with their team. EVERY TEAM will have a weakness that if exposed and exposed enough could potentially cost them the game.

That is why I believe that with Saban's physical and game preparation Bama has a chance (a real chance) to knock off anybody on any given Saturday.
 

GrandBayTider

All-SEC
Nov 21, 2004
1,813
0
0
57
Prattville, AL
If Russell was back for his senior year, I'd be thinking BCS bowl and a shot at a national title. But the offense must gel under Flynn and this could take time that LSU doesn't have, playing Top-10 VT on September 8. If it gels fast, LSU's high pre-season ranking could get them in the title chase at seasons end. If it takes a half-season to gel, LSU could struggle to remain in the top-10.
I think the VT/LSU game will have a big impact on the season. If VT is able to pull it out, I could really hurt LSUs confidence. However, if LSU is able to uphold the SEC standard in big games, they will be on a roll and primed for a run at a NC!

I look for Bama at about 8-4 depending on the play along the line. If we see improvement along the line, the record could be better. Can't wait till kickoff.
 

JessN

Administrator & Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
6,413
5,118
432
I'm not trying to throw cold water on expectations, but Alabama will only win as many games as its defense will allow it to, and that will depend on how quickly we can integrate current players into the new scheme. UA will also be depending greatly on freshmen.

People have tried to say, "Oh, the new defense isn't that much different than the old one," when in actuality it couldn't get any more different if it tried. There isn't a single position on the field that is being taught the same way or that will have the same responsibilities. Zero. Not a single one.

If the defense jels quickly in the fall, the offense has enough talent to make some very good teams nervous. But putting on the darkest pair of crimson glasses I could find after A-Day, I could only make myself cautiously optimistic. Some of what I saw was just plain scary.

There are three or four key positions in this defense where we have zero or one available player who went through spring training -- nose tackle (Motley), left inside LB (Mustin), Jack/left outside linebacker (Knight) and free corner (M.Johnson; Castille, I feel, will end up on the boundary). Most contenders -- not teams, *contenders* -- have two or three people at each position.

Prince Hall also has to get accustomed to being a field signal-caller; we haven't had one of those in four years. Hall is a sophomore and is not yet a complete player by any stretch.

Of the problem spots, I think McClain will start ahead of Mustin, Motley will essentially split NT with two true freshmen (Chapman and McCullough), while Knight and Johnson will hold onto their spots.

This has not yet addressed our weakness at safety, where Marcus Carter has been little more than a placeholder for two years and Rashad Johnson isn't yet a complete safety. If Ricks qualifies, he'll almost certainly displace one of those guys, most likely Carter.

Therefore, you're talking about significant trouble at six of the 11 defensive positions, and we haven't even yet talked about how Keith Saunders, who ran close to a 5.0 forty at junior Pro Day last month, is going to handle OLB. The only thing that keeps me from listing that as a real trouble spot is because we have some depth there that looked OK in the spring (Waldrop, Higgenbotham).

Saban's first season at LSU was very rough around the edges, and I expect his first season here to be the same. Without trying to get too particular about which games are wins and which aren't -- because I'll bet we have one loss somewhere that no one is expecting, maybe an Ole Miss or a Vanderbilt -- I'd say 8-4 is the center of the bell curve, and it could be anywhere from 5-7 on the low side to 9-3 on the high side.
 

realmc1969

1st Team
Dec 9, 2006
424
0
0
I'm not trying to throw cold water on expectations, but Alabama will only win as many games as its defense will allow it to, and that will depend on how quickly we can integrate current players into the new scheme. UA will also be depending greatly on freshmen.

People have tried to say, "Oh, the new defense isn't that much different than the old one," when in actuality it couldn't get any more different if it tried. There isn't a single position on the field that is being taught the same way or that will have the same responsibilities. Zero. Not a single one.

If the defense jels quickly in the fall, the offense has enough talent to make some very good teams nervous. But putting on the darkest pair of crimson glasses I could find after A-Day, I could only make myself cautiously optimistic. Some of what I saw was just plain scary.

There are three or four key positions in this defense where we have zero or one available player who went through spring training -- nose tackle (Motley), left inside LB (Mustin), Jack/left outside linebacker (Knight) and free corner (M.Johnson; Castille, I feel, will end up on the boundary). Most contenders -- not teams, *contenders* -- have two or three people at each position.

Prince Hall also has to get accustomed to being a field signal-caller; we haven't had one of those in four years. Hall is a sophomore and is not yet a complete player by any stretch.

Of the problem spots, I think McClain will start ahead of Mustin, Motley will essentially split NT with two true freshmen (Chapman and McCullough), while Knight and Johnson will hold onto their spots.

This has not yet addressed our weakness at safety, where Marcus Carter has been little more than a placeholder for two years and Rashad Johnson isn't yet a complete safety. If Ricks qualifies, he'll almost certainly displace one of those guys, most likely Carter.

Therefore, you're talking about significant trouble at six of the 11 defensive positions, and we haven't even yet talked about how Keith Saunders, who ran close to a 5.0 forty at junior Pro Day last month, is going to handle OLB. The only thing that keeps me from listing that as a real trouble spot is because we have some depth there that looked OK in the spring (Waldrop, Higgenbotham).

Saban's first season at LSU was very rough around the edges, and I expect his first season here to be the same. Without trying to get too particular about which games are wins and which aren't -- because I'll bet we have one loss somewhere that no one is expecting, maybe an Ole Miss or a Vanderbilt -- I'd say 8-4 is the center of the bell curve, and it could be anywhere from 5-7 on the low side to 9-3 on the high side.
That is exactly what I would say if I was gonna be pessimistic. I think if we stay healthy on offense we will be in every game we play. Our offensive line is going to be a lot better and our receivers are all playing better, our running backs are better. Our offense is just BETTER. I'm not expecting a national championship or even an sec championship. But 5-7 is not acceptable barring serious setbacks by injuries.
 

JessN

Administrator & Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
6,413
5,118
432
That is exactly what I would say if I was gonna be pessimistic. I think if we stay healthy on offense we will be in every game we play. Our offensive line is going to be a lot better and our receivers are all playing better, our running backs are better. Our offense is just BETTER. I'm not expecting a national championship or even an sec championship. But 5-7 is not acceptable barring serious setbacks by injuries.
I think we'll be in every game, but with as many changes as we've made we also are going to be sitting on a live time bomb every play.

History proves it. In 2001, when we went from Ellis Johnson's defense to Carl Torbush's defense, we got reamed a couple of times, once by Saban's LSU team. The same thing happened in 2003 when we moved from Torbush's scheme to Kines' scheme. Both of those years involved major scheme changes and changes in the recruiting philosophy.

It is far more likely that Alabama will struggle on defense than succeed wildly.
 

TIDEFAN17

All-American
Mar 20, 2001
2,125
2
157
41
Tennessee
I think we'll be in every game, but with as many changes as we've made we also are going to be sitting on a live time bomb every play.

History proves it. In 2001, when we went from Ellis Johnson's defense to Carl Torbush's defense, we got reamed a couple of times, once by Saban's LSU team. The same thing happened in 2003 when we moved from Torbush's scheme to Kines' scheme. Both of those years involved major scheme changes and changes in the recruiting philosophy.

It is far more likely that Alabama will struggle on defense than succeed wildly.
The 2000 defense was nothing to write home about and even the 99' defense which was a pretty good one gave up quite a few points. I agree with your comment on how the defense ultimately holds the cards on wins/losses this season. The 2001 season is the PERFECT example of this.
 

moorav

Banned
Dec 6, 2006
1,398
0
0
>In 2001, when we went from Ellis Johnson's defense to Carl Torbush's >defense, we got reamed a couple of times, once by Saban's LSU team. The >same thing happened in 2003 when we moved from Torbush's scheme to >Kines' scheme.

I would like to think that Saban is a better coach than Torbush & Ellis Johnson & has the ability to get it going much quicker but apparently I am in the minority with my confidence in Saban & Co's ability.

I think we at least win 9 games - there is no powerhouses on our schedule.
 

New Posts

Latest threads