Toggle sidebar

Trump Policies, part IX

  • HELLO AGAIN, Guest! We are back, live! We're still doing some troubleshooting and maintenance to fix a few remaining issues but everything looks stable now (except front page which we're working on over next day or two)

    Thanks for your patience and support! MUCH appreciated! --Brett (BamaNation)

    if you see any problems - please post them in the Troubleshooting board!

  • Like
  • Sad
  • Crying
Reactions: Maudiemae, UAH, Huckleberry and 1 other person
NYT Gift Article

Coast Guard Buys Two Private Jets for Noem, Costing $172 Million
Public documents show the Department of Homeland Security has contracted to purchase a pair of top-of-the-line Gulfstream jets for the secretary and other top officials.

The Department of Homeland Security has purchased two Gulfstream private jets for Kristi Noem, the secretary, and other top department officials at a cost of $172 million, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The jets, which a department official said were needed for safety, are the latest expenditures on behalf of Ms. Noem to draw scrutiny from Democrats and other critics who have noted her lavish spending on living and other expenses during her time in public life.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Maudiemae and 92tide
Huckleberry said:
NYT Gift Article

Coast Guard Buys Two Private Jets for Noem, Costing $172 Million
Public documents show the Department of Homeland Security has contracted to purchase a pair of top-of-the-line Gulfstream jets for the secretary and other top officials.

The Department of Homeland Security has purchased two Gulfstream private jets for Kristi Noem, the secretary, and other top department officials at a cost of $172 million, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The jets, which a department official said were needed for safety, are the latest expenditures on behalf of Ms. Noem to draw scrutiny from Democrats and other critics who have noted her lavish spending on living and other expenses during her time in public life.
Click to expand...
but the democrats are really the ones to blame
 
something else we shouldn't over-react about, i guess
9914ff9995e65f45a8ea6b027433acc12695de52eb851e1bf3002d4202dfea2e.png
 
  • Like
  • Thank You
Reactions: Maudiemae, UAH, some_al_fan and 1 other person
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide, Huckleberry and Maudiemae
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 92tide
only the best people. :ROFLMAO: 😂

My Signal exchange with the interim U.S. attorney about the Letitia James grand jury.


Halligan had said quite a lot during our correspondence, although much of it was hard for me to parse. But there was an important thing she had not said during the entirety of our communications: “Off the record” or “On background” or anything whatsoever about the terms on which we were talking.

---------

At 4:10 p.m., she texted me: “By the way—everything I ever sent you is off record. You’re not a journalist so it’s weird saying that but just letting you know.”

I responded: “I’m sorry, but that’s not how this works. You don’t get to say that in retrospect.”

Halligan was unpersuaded: “Yes I do. Off record.”

“I am really sorry. I would have been happy to speak with you on an off the record basis had you asked,” I said. “But you didn’t ask, and I still haven’t agreed to speak on that basis. Do you have any further comment for the story?

To my surprise, she kept going: “It’s obvious the whole convo is off record. There’s disappearing messages and it’s on signal. What is your story? You never told me about a story.”

I didn’t respond. It was time to publish my story. I’ll text it to her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Posts

|

Latest threads

Top Bottom
Back