In general that's one of the areas of his game that's needed to improve. He also needs to learn putting touch on the ball. He fastballs most of the balls he throws.It may have been a lack of reps but Mack had some accuracy issues against IU.
In general that's one of the areas of his game that's needed to improve. He also needs to learn putting touch on the ball. He fastballs most of the balls he throws.It may have been a lack of reps but Mack had some accuracy issues against IU.
I think having a little bit of both methods is ideal. I know that's hard to find, but most of the time you're going to have a mix of players who need to be coached differently to get them to meet their optimal potential. The great coaches know which players need to be yelled at and which players don't. In a perfect world, a coach could accumulate a roster full of players who can be coached the same. But unfortunately, that isn't realistic.There are different schools of organizational leadership: the George Patton scream at them and publicly fire those who do not perform and the Geo. Washington / Ike / Forrest Gump's "Lieutenant Dan" leadership which inspires subordinates to say, "I sure hope I do not let him down."
Clearly Coach Saban was in the former camp and Coach DeBoer appears to be the latter.
Depending on what material you are working with, one is more effective than the other. I personally think that the former is more effective if those being led are less mature, younger, and just beginning their careers. For more mature, more professional, and older subordinates, the latter is often more effective.
Totally agree. The screaming tyrant approach doesn’t work with older adults. Even Red Auerbach was a total genius in the pros utilizing the latter approach: taking blame for losses/ praising when they win, appealing to their pride, listening for suggestions, etc.There are different schools of organizational leadership: the George Patton scream at them and publicly fire those who do not perform and the Geo. Washington / Ike / Forrest Gump's "Lieutenant Dan" leadership which inspires subordinates to say, "I sure hope I do not let him down."
Clearly Coach Saban was in the former camp and Coach DeBoer appears to be the latter.
Depending on what material you are working with, one is more effective than the other. I personally think that the former is more effective if those being led are less mature, younger, and just beginning their careers. For more mature, more professional, and older subordinates, the latter is often more effective.
I agree a mix is best, but early Coach Saban did a lot of Patton. Later Nick Saban used a lot of Lt Dan.I think having a little bit of both methods is ideal. I know that's hard to find, but most of the time you're going to have a mix of players who need to be coached differently to get them to meet their optimal potential. The great coaches know which players need to be yelled at and which players don't. In a perfect world, a coach could accumulate a roster full of players who can be coached the same. But unfortunately, that isn't realistic.
I think Saban was like that to some degree. I know listening to interviews with Najee Harris, he saied he and CNS got off on the wrong foot. He didn't respond well to constantly being yelled at, and he and CNS butted heads a lot. But as they got to know each other, they found middle ground and it turned into a great relationship.
There is quite intensity. I have seen it from my son's days on the soccer pitch. He had a coach, young, ex MLS player. They'd be down at half time and he'd be quite, pacing right in front of them all, sitting on the bleachers staring at him...you could hear a pin drop. He was intense and you could only see it in practice sometimes verbally. But he projected a quiet intensity that I have rarely ever seen. If he is quite, players knew to shut up and pay attention.I agree a mix is best, but early Coach Saban did a lot of Patton. Later Nick Saban used a lot of Lt Dan.
The only people I have seen Coach DeBoer really raise his voice to is officials when they blow a call. Not saying it does not happen behind closed doors, but it seems to me that would be out of character.
Dealing with/coaching a group of players on a team is an art that's tough to learn. I've coached baseball for umpteen years, from ages 8 to 18 and every age in between. Human beings are a tricky bunch, and all of them are wired a lot differently and others subtly differently.I agree a mix is best, but early Coach Saban did a lot of Patton. Later Nick Saban used a lot of Lt Dan.
The only people I have seen Coach DeBoer really raise his voice to is officials when they blow a call. Not saying it does not happen behind closed doors, but it seems to me that would be out of character.
That's been my impression too. He reminds me a little of Freddy Kitchens in that regard. He does have a beautiful presence in the pocket, being so tall and he has a good throwing motion, although it comes out a little sidearmed.In general that's one of the areas of his game that's needed to improve. He also needs to learn putting touch on the ball. He fastballs most of the balls he throws.
Nick was on the Pat Macafee show this week and talked about the demands of coaching at Alabama. He said its good to finish in the top eight of the playoffs, but it is not good enough at Alabama. That the staff was going to have to find a way to get better.I think CKD will be coaching for his job this next season. I think if he weren't feeling the pressure he wouldn't have let Coach Kap go.
As so many others have said, there are multiple changes that need to be made.
Strength and conditioning certainly needs to be revamped. We are definitely neither strong or explosive.
Offensive line-----at least a coaching change was made.
The staff needs to demand more of themselves and in turn demand more of the players.
I really think that if this staff doesn't show marked and somewhat drastic improvement from last season to this season the boosters may find the funds for his buyout and part ways.
I hope he is successful because that means the team is successful. But he better get it figured out that finesse just ain't gonna get it, You gotta get tougher (physically and mentally) and commit to running the ball or you may get "run out of town".
I agree a mix is best, but early Coach Saban did a lot of Patton. Later Nick Saban used a lot of Lt Dan.
The only people I have seen Coach DeBoer really raise his voice to is officials when they blow a call. Not saying it does not happen behind closed doors, but it seems to me that would be out of character.
I think he is a very cerebral coach and knows the X's and O's of the game very well. I just think he lacks putting the physicality component in his approach which ultimately causes problems. Because when you lose the physicality aspect of the game, the X's and O's dont matter. But I'm hoping that after two years in the SEC, DeBoer has learned and adjusted. If not, he is choosing to put a ceiling on his own coaching development.Ultimately, I gauge a person's success in an endeavor by the passion they bring to the endeavor and how well they communicate that passion. CKD mindless drivel shared with the media does not tell me he is a passionate person as he needs to be. He is too cerebral. He still thinks he can outthink his opponents and ultimately at the highest levels of competition you are going to out-execute and overpower your opponent.
He has yet to embrace that the fans are integral to his success as a coach at Bama. The sooner he recognizes this and starts communicating passionately with the media the better for him.
Dubose and Shula in particular failed in this area.
I agree with the bolded part. If he is faking it, the players will see through it and he won't be able to keep it up all the time.@Tidewater, I agree with you, that seems to be out of character for him.
I noticed that Coach DeBoer tried to be more demonstrative on the field this past season.
Even noticed him slamming his fist up against the goalpost, just before the team ran out on the field. I remember thinking how contrived that appeared to be.
As a bit of disclaimer, I really appreciate his calm demeanor and I don't agree with others on this board that believe a coach has to be spitting fire and four-letter words to get a person's attention.
I do agree with others who have said that different people respond to different styles. I know this to be true, but I maintain that a coach needs to stay true to his innate character.
I think players will ultimately respond to a person who is genuine and sincere, not someone who is trying to be what they think others would like for them to be.
Bottom line, I think Coach will find his groove and, if given ample opportunity, will build a program we can be proud of.
Roll Tide!