You disagree with my comment that Dart didnt appear to be very good.I would respectfully disagree re: Dart. IMHO I think the play of the D had a lot to do with appearances concerning Dart.
He appeared to be very good in that game to you ?
You disagree with my comment that Dart didnt appear to be very good.I would respectfully disagree re: Dart. IMHO I think the play of the D had a lot to do with appearances concerning Dart.
Baby steps.If they played like that they did in 2nd half for every half for the rest of the season, they'd win the NC.
No, all I`m saying is that his difficulties were contributed to by the play of the defense more so than any lack of ability as a QB. He was under duress.You disagree with my comment that Dart didnt appear to be very good.
He appeared to be very good in that game to you ?
Those rankings don’t mean much at this time since many teams haven’t played anyone with a pulse yet, much less a top 5 and top 20. At this point in the season this looks like at least a top 10 D despite stats with no context - maybe the best Bama D since 2017.The point wasn’t to compare the 2023 D to the 2022 D other than to suggest we tap the brakes on suggesting Bama’s D is back. When they’re top10 in the primary defensive statistical rankings we can talk - that’s where the legit Saban defenses have been ranked.
Is Bama‘s D better in 2023? I believe so, but they have lots of room to improve.
It looked to me as though he was affected by the pressures. Noticeably more than Ewers experienced. Texas has a better OL I am sure. I didn't look at the Baylor vs UTx game at all, so I am not sure about that.I think the ILB play after Lawson left was very good. Promising.
Jackson Dart didn’t appear to be very good.
I agree with Brad on the 2023 defense, it is too soon to tell. Our defense is better, but Ole Miss doesn't look as good as they did last year at this point. They play LSU in Oxford on Saturday which should say something about their 2023 team.The point wasn’t to compare the 2023 D to the 2022 D other than to suggest we tap the brakes on suggesting Bama’s D is back. When they’re top10 in the primary defensive statistical rankings we can talk - that’s where the legit Saban defenses have been ranked.
Is Bama‘s D better in 2023? I believe so, but they have lots of room to improve.
I did...and their OL was better, but they also had lapses. They easily should have hung 60 on the Bears.It looked to me as though he was affected by the pressures. Noticeably more than Ewers experienced. Texas has a better OL I am sure. I didn't look at the Baylor vs UTx game at all, so I am not sure about that.
I'm concerned with the start time and location.To follow up on Alabama's schedule thus far, Sagarin actually has Alabama ranked #1 and has them with an SoS of 10. Of course you have to take computers with a grain of salt, especially early, but it's obviously indicative of a tough schedule.
The Miss. State game should be a really good indicator of where this Alabama team is. Miss. State is a competitive but ultimately mediocre team, so we should learn some things.
I agree to an extent. I think they can be very good to almost elite based on what I've seen so far. The primary issues keeping them from elite are they do not have a Day 1 draft pick at the tackle position and they don't have the talented depth up front that they used to enjoy. I also think the LBs are good but not elite.Lost in the shuffle, this is one of the best Bama defenses in years. They have had only one bad quarter out of 16 quarters, which is incredible. And that one bad quarter, the defense was tired in that fourth quarter of the game, because our offense couldn’t sustain drives.
Thank you Mr. Steele and Mr. Saban.
I agree with Brad on the 2023 defense, it is too soon to tell. Our defense is better, but Ole Miss doesn't look as good as they did last year at this point. They play LSU in Oxford on Saturday which should say something about their 2023 team.
I am not going to argue either of these points because yall could both be very right. I want to see Bama play more games. I will argue I can see a difference already. There is more intensity, guys seem to be out of place less and less, and we are getting more turnovers. I know some fans are harping on qb's getting away when the play breaks down, but I don't know how you prepare for that. Overall, I would say this is a step in the right direction.I agree to an extent. I think they can be very good to almost elite based on what I've seen so far. The primary issues keeping them from elite are they do not have a Day 1 draft pick at the tackle position and they don't have the talented depth up front that they used to enjoy. I also think the LBs are good but not elite.
Nick Saban defense 101. Cornerbacks on an island. And get enough pressure early so routes don’t have enough time to develop. And have linebackers and ball-hawking safeties who play out of their mind to defend the middle. It works 98% of the time.I just don't understand why, no matter who our DC has been recently, we refuse to cover the middle of the field. Whether it is a running QB, a TE or a slant to a WR, the middle of the field was open the whole game.
I can’t argue with that.I am not going to argue either of these points because yall could both be very right. I want to see Bama play more games. I will argue I can see a difference already. There is more intensity, guys seem to be out of place less and less, and we are getting more turnovers. I know some fans are harping on qb's getting away when the play breaks down, but I don't know how you prepare for that. Overall, I would say this is a step in the right direction.
Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.