Anyone have any potential insight in to would we play on Friday or Saturday? It looks like there is one game scheduled for Friday 12/20 and three games on Saturday 12/21...
i was also curious about the schedule? Friday game will be night game (colder). One of the Saturday game will be relatively warmerAnyone have any potential insight in to would we play on Friday or Saturday? It looks like there is one game scheduled for Friday 12/20 and three games on Saturday 12/21...
I don't think they have said anything about this yet. I would imagine they would want a big one for the Friday night opener. So, Alabama @ Notre Dame could be a strong candidate.Anyone have any potential insight in to would we play on Friday or Saturday? It looks like there is one game scheduled for Friday 12/20 and three games on Saturday 12/21...
That’s because there is a 2 loss difference. (Myself and others have called the ACC a 1 bid league. That’s true in most cases but IMO, there are exceptions. E.g., if two undefeated teams were to meet in the ACCCG, the loser would likely get in over any 3 loss SEC or B10 team or even a 2 loss Indiana-type team.).Agreed, but one could also argue that they didn't have to rank SMU ahead of Alabama, but they did.
The only single-loss team ranked below Bama is Army, and they're a special case. I don't read anything into ranking a one-loss B12 team over a three-loss SEC team.Agreed, but one could also argue that they didn't have to rank SMU ahead of Alabama, but they did.
They're a one-loss ACC team, realignment is weird.The only single-loss team ranked below Bama is Army, and they're a special case. I don't read anything into ranking a one-loss B12 team over a three-loss SEC team.
Good catch.They're a one-loss ACC team, realignment is weird.
If losing to OU and Vandy is bad, then losing to the team that lost to OU and Vandy must be bad, too.Local UGA fans say that Bama doesnt deserve to be in because of 3 bad losses and that SC deserves to be in over Ole Miss and they didnt make the SECCG.........last year Bama made and won the SECCG and they said they deserved to be in over Bama because of their resume..........and in both years Bama beat UGA..............they and everyone else dont want Bama in...........and it makes you wonder why
They thought it would keep Bama from winning the natty as much, but they actually created a system where Bama may get in every single year. Joke's on them.Remember how the 12-team playoff was going to solve everything. I see no difference except it's the 13th and 14th seeded teams crying.
I'm still of the opinion that SMU will take a tumble if they lose, and logically I think the only way they don't is if the committee is convinced they still played better than Clemson. For instance, if Clemson wins on a late blown call or something and everyone looks at it and goes oh they deserved to win.Agreed, but one could also argue that they didn't have to rank SMU ahead of Alabama, but they did.
I would love to see that matchup but I think it's pretty unlikely.I don't think they have said anything about this yet. I would imagine they would want a big one for the Friday night opener. So, Alabama @ Notre Dame could be a strong candidate.
I hear you, but it is just as likely that a UGA win could only drop Texas to 5 and ND still at 6. Or the committee could decide to but a Clemson winner or an ASU winner right above us at 11 to prove some kind of point and we are 12 and could pull ND in the 5v12 match. There are still a lot of scenarios and movement ahead.I would love to see that matchup but I think it's pretty unlikely.
Alabama, if it makes the CFP, will be #10 or #11. That means it will be play #6 or #7.
Unless Penn State upsets Oregon, Notre Dame will move past Penn State in the rankings and end up as the 5th seed, not 6th.
More likely opponents for us (if we end up as #11) are:
* Ohio State if Penn State loses to Oregon
* Texas if it loses to UGA
* Penn State if it loses against Oregon and the committee doesn't really push PSU down much
* Tennessee if Penn State loses to Oregon and Texas beats UGA
SMU is ahead of AlabamaIf they didn’t want Bama in, they wouldn’t have us ahead of Miami…
But, but............that's different (In the minds of a UGA fan)If losing to OU and Vandy is bad, then losing to the team that lost to OU and Vandy must be bad, too.
I say they should drop UGA from the field.
All the fringe teams and their fan bases are whining 11-15 or so.Remember how the 12-team playoff was going to solve everything. I see no difference except it's the 13th and 14th seeded teams crying.
Tenn loss isn’t bad.Local UGA fans say that Bama doesnt deserve to be in because of 3 bad losses and that SC deserves to be in over Ole Miss and they didnt make the SECCG.........last year Bama made and won the SECCG and they said they deserved to be in over Bama because of their resume..........and in both years Bama beat UGA..............they and everyone else dont want Bama in...........and it makes you wonder why
The Vandy loss hurts more due to history.Tenn loss isn’t bad.
Top 10 rivalry game on the road and still kept the score close for the most part with a QB who couldn’t throw the ball in the Ocean from a Boat.
It’s Vandy that’s bad and OU that’s unforgivable.
I can't get past it and can't think of a single worse loss in my life when you take the context into account wrt the stakes and completely no showing in effort and preparation.The Vandy loss hurts more due to history.
Their resume this year is pretty legit.
OU was horrible…
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.