The "I told you so crowd" didn't give up 18 sacks in the final two games, the OL did.ldlane said:The "I told you so crowd" is what is wrong with Football at the University of Alabama not the Offensive Line!
The "I told you so crowd" didn't give up 18 sacks in the final two games, the OL did.ldlane said:The "I told you so crowd" is what is wrong with Football at the University of Alabama not the Offensive Line!
I said this before. It wasn't that we lost. I can deal with that.JessN said:I'm not looking for perfection. I didn't pick it in the preseason, so I can't say I expected it now. But someone else way back in this thread had it right: There wouldn't be nearly as much dissatisfaction had Alabama actually showed some drive against Auburn. It's performances like these that worry people.
You see it doesn't matter. This goes deeper than Wins and Losses. It is a problem that has grown out of proportion since the hiring of Coach Bryant and the coming of "The Family." Since the passing of Coach Bryant this small, elite group of former players, boosters and fans has poisoned football at Alabama for the common fan.HITIDE said:"Peaking at midseason and then fading??....Don't you thing it could have something to do with:
(1) The "meat" on our schedule is the latter part of the season?
(2) Undermanned and lack of depth can cause weariness?
(3) Lack of depth (again) shows up more when players are nicked and bruised?
(4) Lack of depth (again) is impossible to overcome when key players are injured and out for the season?
Was is just a coincedance that our season faltered after 3 games last year, when we started having injuries that put us down to the 3rd string QB, 4th string RB and 3rd string TE?
Could it also just be coincedance it happened this year after losing our top playmaker and Center on offense?
Bama will have a full class of seniors in 2008 and that should be the year the evaluations of CMS start. We can't forget that the momentum the success that Tubs has had (while Bama was/is down) has also carried over into recruiting and will make it even tougher to beat them at full strength. I believe the success that CMS has shown with the undermanned and crippled teams he has had to field that he will get the job done.
I also believe that if the Bama Nation is not behind him it will make it that much harder. Recruits like programs that put off positive vibes (this includes from the fans). JMHO
Yes, some of the problems could be a result of these things... however, it also could be a result of our game planning being "figured out" by our opponents by that time in the season. Also, just as we are nicked up, so are the defensive players we face. Problem is that this is not a "one-time thing." This has been occuring prior to this year, even when we had quality OL depth (03/04; although you can throw out last year due to backfield problems). Jess accurately points out that the trend has to be stopped one way or the other... if it doesn't, CMS will not be around to make that decision in a couple of years."Peaking at midseason and then fading??....Don't you thing it could have something to do with:
(1) The "meat" on our schedule is the latter part of the season?
(2) Undermanned and lack of depth can cause weariness?
(3) Lack of depth (again) shows up more when players are nicked and bruised?
(4) Lack of depth (again) is impossible to overcome when key players are injured and out for the season?
Your argument plays right to one of our other problems... creativity on offense and the ability to make adjustments to minimize your weaknesses. Bottom line is that Steve Spurrier used his offense creatively this year to get to 7 wins... had he displayed the same philosophy we have had over the past couple of years (no adjustments... just reduce the playbook), he would have been at 4 or less. BTW, our offensive woes were clearly shown before Closner went down... if you doubt it, go back and watch the MSU game BEFORE his injury. Also, it we ought to learn a lesson that (if what you're saying is correct) we have to be careful in using our front-line players any more than absolutely needed in a game (i.e. pull them when the game is no longer in doubt).Was is just a coincedance that our season faltered after 3 games last year, when we started having injuries that put us down to the 3rd string QB, 4th string RB and 3rd string TE?
Could it also just be coincedance it happened this year after losing our top playmaker and Center on offense?
True. Very true. That is what bites me the most. Now we have broken down into two camps: Apologist and Realist. Which one is right? Ask an Apologist. Realistically, the preparation for the game left a lot to be desired as did the execution.TiderinMiss said:I said this before. It wasn't that we lost. I can deal with that.
But, even yesterday, as I visted with some relatives who were Auburn fans...it was the way we lost that game (flat, unemotional to start the game) that still bothers me.
Knowing who you are and the relationship you have with several important people at the University, I'm in full agreement with the gist of your post. However, it is because things are different that the "microscope mentality" is tougher today than it ever has been in the past. Today, we receive much more information and have much more hype regarding sports in general (i.e. the T.O. situation in PA). As a result, there will be greater criticism from the public sector. Criticism, however, does not automatically indicate a lack of support/respect for either coaches or players. Frankly, sometimes it is the only thing that puts pressure upon those (being criticized) to correct the problem (s) that exist. With that said, it is always wise to remember that criticism usually works best when it is couple with some positives.BUT: Just know that we as fans can play such a big role in the image of our program in this NEW & DIFFERENT age than the way things were back in the 60's & 70's...Things ARE different - & we need to remember that how we present what we agree or disagree with makes a DIFFERENCE. And we need to remember that how we respect/stand by our coaches & players publically makes a HUGE difference. I'm not kidding.
RamJam,RamJam said:RICH: I gotcha...& you're so right - the sprinkling in of those positives was exactly what I meant when I stated that the presentation of what we say is so very important...
IDLANE: I do know that the people in the postions to hire/fire don't subscribe to the attitude you're describing, thankfully...some of those who would like to think their pressure would influence those people exercise it often, & so do some fans' - but the actual ones doing the hiring/firing just plain don't think in those terms.
I have really enjoyed reading this thread - very very interesting. I so respect Jess' thoughts & IDLANE & several others who psoted here & other threads as well - I think it all boils down to what we all just CANNOT WAIT FOR: the day when we're once again on EQUAL playing terms - PERIOD!![]()