Colloquially, yes. Not technically. Global warming drives climate change.If all of theses "scrupulous" scientists were to be proven wrong about this "global warming/climate change" stuff (both terms used because they are interchangeable depending on how warm or cold it is when the esteemed champion Albert Gore gets out of bed each morning)
Actually not a lot. If they're trying to get rich then they're doing it wrong. A "hmm, that's funny" result would be an amazing find. It would overturn a century and a half of study in physics (Which, and I hate to break it to you, ain't happening. You might as well hold your breath for a breakthrough in a theory as well supported as germ theory. It's seriously that unlikely). And it would attract a lot of funding from some very rich industries.how much money would they stand to lose in the way of gov't grants and losing positions held at liberal universities and such?
You laugh, but I've got a friend that is actually a food scientist with some patents to his name. Some of his research sounds pretty silly.Maybe I can get the gov't to give me a grant to study that? Might be as worthwhile as studying the thicknesses of different ketchup, huh? Scientists really learned a lot from that one.