Toggle sidebar

Espn e-60

Auburn likes to blame their constant poor portrayals on major sports journalism sites and ESPN as an Alabama conspiracy. The truth is that all the national journalists invested a lot of time and effort in showing that Cam Newton was ineligible. When Auburn maneuvered the legal tight rope to keep him eligible, they got a big target put on their back from the major journalists. It has nothing to do with Alabama...if there is a conspiracy, it is simply that the sports journalism profession is out to get them.
 
Last edited:
This same show has a great in depth story on Eddie Lacy. He represents Bama in SUCH a good way!
 
OMG I never post but I am praying for Eddie Lacy and his family. I hope he goes sooner than predicted. I was almost in tears afteer seeing his story.
 
Great story on Lacy...I really appreciated even more the struggle he has faced and how he has overcome. He is using the game for what it is...a way out for him. I hope he has his degree...games do not last forever.
 
Last edited:
kat4bama said:
OMG I never post but I am praying for Eddie Lacy and his family. I hope he goes sooner than predicted. I was almost in tears afteer seeing his story.
Click to expand...

You'd be amazed at the damage that is STILL there in NOLA from Katrina. Seen a ton of it after working Isaac.
 
Just watched the Eddie Lacy feature on E:60. Man I'm really rooting for him to do well at the next level. A great kid and look forward to keeping track of his NFL career. Lacy sat and waited his turn behind Ingram and Richardson then made the most of it having his two biggest games in the SEC title game and BCS title game. Doesn't get much better than that.
 
GP for Bama said:
This show is damning to Auburn.
Click to expand...

Isn`t part of the AU "explanation" that there wasn`t a test out that allowed them to detect spice use any earlier than when they began to test? A part of the piece indicated that UA began testing before the 2010 season, if I heard it correctly. Anybody else pick up on that?
 
Tideflyer said:
Isn`t part of the AU "explanation" that there wasn`t a test out that allowed them to detect spice use any earlier than when they began to test? A part of the piece indicated that UA began testing before the 2010 season, if I heard it correctly. Anybody else pick up on that?
Click to expand...


Yes - that is the AU explanation and parroted by the state media. They wanted a better test from a lab closer to home (Nashville, I think) whereas the the original UA test wasn't as good and was located way out in California.
 
Tideflyer said:
Isn`t part of the AU "explanation" that there wasn`t a test out that allowed them to detect spice use any earlier than when they began to test? A part of the piece indicated that UA began testing before the 2010 season, if I heard it correctly. Anybody else pick up on that?
Click to expand...

BAMA - July 2010
au - August 2011

is what was stated I believe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads

Top Bottom
Back