Lemme throw this at cha...
My ex lives in Florida. She get food stamps, assisted housing, Medicare, more back from her income taxes than she pays in, and gets my child support.
Now to have all of this, she tells the state of Florida that I do not pay child support, so she rides on the "single mother" bandwagon, however, her and her current live in boyfriend pull down a combined $60K per year.
In contrast, I pay a mortage on my home and a rental property, pay my taxes and hers too from the looks of it, and work my ..... off. In fairness, I have succeeded enough to where I am finally beginning to enjoy the fruits of my labor, and having fun.
Fact is, there are people who manipulate the "system", and I have learned enough to say that they will probably get away with it for life. But, some of us know what's right and what's not right.
Clild support does not end unless the children are adopted...I feel for you buddy. If you can get your ex to marry this new guy the child support will go away.
I feel for you buddy. If you can get your ex to marry this new guy the child support will go away.
No it won't. It doesn't matter whether his ex marries this boyfriend or not. If it's his child, he is responsible for the child support, until the child reaches a certain age.
You're not the only one to get frustrated and angry over cases of abuse such as the one you illustrated. I've seen women pile shopping carts full of meats and brand name groceries, pay for it with government debit cards (or in the past, food stamps, ADC or WIC coupons) then wheel them all out and load the bags into an Escalade, Excursion or even a Hummer.
As long as the government rewards and subsidizes laziness and punishes those of us who bear the cost through our tax dollars, abuses like this will continue.
Which is one reason that I've always been of the opinion that people who feed at the public trough shouldn't be allowed to vote.
When you add up all the benefits received by a family on welfare, they probably earn upwards of $35K or $40K per year by sitting at home and doing nothing...
So is this another argument in favor increasing the minimum wage, so as to make it more rewarding to work than to sit at home and collect welfare?