Plasma or LCD?

NYBamaFan

Suspended
Feb 2, 2002
23,316
14
0
Blairstown, NJ
LCD. Better picture, uses less electricity, no burn in problems.

They are more expensive, but worth it. I have the 52" Sony Bravia. All I can say is, awesome...
 

VolFan1

All-American
Feb 6, 2009
2,660
0
0
Rocky Top
Here is a Google link of the life span of the two. I have a 50" Samsung plasma. I went with it due to the hard front screen.

Samsung claims a 60,000 hour life. That is longer than tube TVs. This link claims that on their LCD, it does not give specific hour life on plasma, it does say 23 years.
 

NYBamaFan

Suspended
Feb 2, 2002
23,316
14
0
Blairstown, NJ
I think that both platforms have solved those problems, but repair for either is expensive after the warranty expires. In other words, unless you get a faulty set, you will still be watching either after 7 years. Here is an excerpt from a comparison:

Life-time
The rare gases used in plasma display panels have a life-time and will fade gradually over use. Earlier plasma displays had a quoted half-lifetime of 20,000hrs, following which the image brightness will fall to half its original value. However, the latest generation of plasma displays boosts a quoted half-lifetime of 60,000hrs. Similarly, LCD displays have an expected quoted half-lifetime of between 50,000hrs and 60,000hrs. It is true that quoted half-lifetime figures by manufacturers tend to be somewhat inflated, but still these figures contrast heavily with the typical 20,000hrs half-lifetime for direct-view CRT TV sets.

But what do these half-lifetime figures imply? Statistics show that TVs in an average US household remain on for over 7.5hrs a day. Furthermore, on average, a TV set is replaced every 7 years. Taking a conservative figure of 30,000 hours half-lifetime for either technology, this works out to well over 10 years of daily use before these flat-panel TV sets would need replacement.

It is thus clear that lifetime is not an issue when it comes to comparing plasma vs LCD display technology.

At the same time, keep in mind that there is no way to regenerate the gases in a plasma display. Similarly, it is impossible to repair any ‘dead’ pixels that may develop during use in an LCD panel. The only option in these circumstances will be to replace the display.
 

thetideinmd

1st Team
Aug 14, 2004
600
0
0
62
western md.
we have a 40" Hitachi plasma and a 34" Vizio. we got them about 8 weeks apart. we like the Hitachi but LOVE the Vizio! wished we bought it first. we'd saved $$$$ and bought a second one.
the sony is very nice, my parents have one.
 

SavannahDare

Hall of Fame
Jul 23, 2004
15,166
317
102
Gulf Breeze, Florida
I doubt seven years from now any of us will want to be watching anything we buy today. TVs are becoming more and more like computers considering how the technology is advancing.

That being said, our 52" Phillips Ambilight is an LCD and we love it!! Amazing quality and sound.
 

NYBamaFan

Suspended
Feb 2, 2002
23,316
14
0
Blairstown, NJ
Mine hangs above the fireplace... We only watch it straight on... I wasnt aware of that issue.
Each of the platforms has weaknesses. This is the one that the LED TVs face, right now. I have large rooms, so off-angle viewing is very important to me. For those without those concerns, it is a great option...
 

Rafiki

Banned
Aug 7, 2009
240
0
0
Empyrean Isles
I bought a 32" plasma for the bedroom. At the time so many of the LCD had issues with with fast motion/adventure type of viewing.

My plasma has an awesome pic without an angle viewing issue. You can almost heat the room with it during a prolonged viewing.

I believe that a TV with a higher contrast ratio gives a sharper image LCD or plasma
 
Last edited:

Rafiki

Banned
Aug 7, 2009
240
0
0
Empyrean Isles
On some models of the LCD (little more than year ago) there were "trails" that resulted from fast motion. I believe that has been alleviated on all but the lower end models. I would say that the sale reps could help you with the info, but every time that I have been in Best Buy I have wanted to strangle someone. People that look and act like they have been bobbing for french fries shouldn't be involved with the public in any capacity.
 

gmart74

Hall of Fame
Oct 9, 2005
12,336
2
57
Baltimore, Md
Due to a recent career advancement (with a hefty signing bonus), I am now in the market for a new widescreen.

Should I go plasma or LCD?

Which has better picture quality? Which lasts longer?

Budget is almost unlimited...
Posted via Mobile Device
dont even bother with plasma. it is a dying technology. lcd is the way to go.
 

Mamacalled

Hall of Fame
Dec 4, 2000
6,786
22
157
59
Pelham, Al
From one consumer report that I heard, plasma is better for rooms with low light while LCD works better in rooms with alot of light.
 

Bama4Ever831

All-American
Sep 13, 2005
2,208
0
45
36
Tuscaloosa, AL
From my experience, the most bang for your buck is an LCD. I don't have a Vizio LCD, but they look GREAT for the price. Get a 1080p and you'll be very happy.
 

Latest threads