So how are you guys interpreting this info? Are there far fewer than 270,000 Russian casualties, or could the Russians have a 1:5 death to casualty ratio?
Everything I come up with has a huge, "yeah, but..." attached to the end.
As in, Canadian KIA to WIA ratio in WW2 was 2:3. Yeah, but....military field medicine has improved so much since then, especially with the advent of the medevac helicopter.
Yeah, but....the Russian's aren't exactly models of medical care for their soldiers (or anybody else, for that matter). I don't think they know or care to know their own numbers.
Yeah, but....if the Russians don't know their numbers, how can the Ukrainians possibly know? Plus, they have an incentive to make the number of total casualties as high as possible.
Bottom Line: I have no idea what an even ballpark number might be, and I don't think either the Russians or the Ukrainians know.
For Americans, the KIA / WIA ratio in Viet Nam might be a more telling comparison. But also don't know what that might have been. I do remember it being reported that, if a wounded American soldier in Viet Nam made it to a field hospital, his odds of surviving were in excess of 90%. Most KIAs were in the field. Some in transport. Still doesn't offer insight on the ratio, though.