Russia Invades Ukraine XVIII

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
86,275
44,092
437
Huntsville, AL,USA

View attachment 50629
Did a pope have to pass for this epiphany?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UAH and Huckleberry

Huckleberry

Hall of Fame
Nov 9, 2004
6,327
13,364
287
Jacksonville, FL

US and Ukraine sign critical minerals deal

The United States and Ukraine have signed an “economic partnership agreement” that will give Washington access to Kyiv’s rare earth minerals in exchange for establishing an investment fund in Ukraine.

...

“This agreement signals clearly to Russia that the Trump Administration is committed to a peace process centered on a free, sovereign, and prosperous Ukraine over the long term,” Bessant said. “And to be clear, no state or person who financed or supplied the Russian war machine will be allowed to benefit from the reconstruction of Ukraine.”

Ukraine’s Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko was in Washington to sign on behalf of the Ukrainian government

Among the terms of the agreement are “full ownership and control” staying with Ukraine, she posted to X on Wednesday.

“All resources on our territory and in territorial waters belong to Ukraine,” she said, adding: “It is the Ukrainian state that determines what and where to extract. Subsoil remains under Ukrainian ownership — this is clearly established in the Agreement.”
 

Bamaro

TideFans Legend
Oct 19, 2001
28,597
13,879
287
Jacksonville, Md USA
Lawmakers skeptical of Trump’s Ukraine deal
A draft agreement of the potential deal to split management of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals and oil and natural gas reserves that circulated Thursday did not include a firm security guarantee for Ukraine, something that several Republican senators said would be critical to any viable peace deal.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) cautioned that a “complicating factor” is that “a good portion of the minerals that we’re talking about are underneath the ground of where Russian soldiers are standing right now in the occupied area.”
Lawmakers skeptical over Trump's Ukraine mineral deal
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,322
18,173
337
Hooterville, Vir.
A minerals deal is a good thing, but a long way from peace.
I'm afraid the incentives to get Putin to agree a peace deal are not strong enough yet.
He is not responding to positive reinforcement. And right now he if he continues the fight, Russia is compensated with more and more Ukrainian territory.
The negative reinforcement for non-compliance is riskier, however. What can the West do (that they have not already done) to punish Russia for not signing a peace deal? The West has donated tens of billion of dollars worth of military aid and that has not stopped the gradual Russian advance. Send western troops to fight? Europe could stop buying Russian oil but others will buy it and getting oil from elsewhere will just cost more.
There are just limits to soft power (and semi-soft power like embargoes) can accomplish. At some point, hard power, as in military force, are needed and I am not sure anybody wants to send their troops to Ukraine to fight.
 

JDCrimson

Hall of Fame
Feb 12, 2006
6,459
6,464
187
52
I get it but does Russia opening another front on Ukraine coming through Belarus change the calculus for Europe and NATO? At some point what is necessary must prevail over what someone wants to do...

Putin sees the US at it weakest point geopolitically probably in 100 years under Trump's leadership. He probably sees this as his window to alter the alignment of Europe and thus has no incentive to stop the war.

A minerals deal is a good thing, but a long way
I'm afraid the incentives to get Putin to agree a peace deal are not strong enough yet.
He is not responding to positive reinforcement. And right now he if he continues the fight, Russia is compensated with more and more Ukrainian territory.
The negative reinforcement for non-compliance is riskier, however. What can the West do (that they have not already done) to punish Russia for not signing a peace deal? The West has donated tens of billion of dollars worth of military aid and that has not stopped the gradual Russian advance. Send western troops to fight? Europe could stop buying Russian oil but others will buy it and getting oil from elsewhere will just cost more.
There are just limits to soft power (and semi-soft power like embargoes) can accomplish. At some point, hard power, as in military force, are needed and I am not sure anybody wants to send their troops to Ukraine to fight.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thank You
Reactions: dtgreg and UAH

New Posts

Latest threads