I deliberately put that statement in bold to lead the conversation away from any specific reasons that the personnel may have had on the results. I wanted to focus on the merits of the different schemes. The numbers for each season begs for a comparison."Personel differences aside", I do not think the spread is what beat us in either of those two games this year...
It is purely an academic question - do we have the right scheme to consistently beat the spread even if we improve the talent? I'm not an X's and O's kind of person, but I really like it when others are and can explain it. Thanks Jess!
One observation on my part is that it seems like when talking about defenses that the conversation leaves out the impact the offense on the D's performance. If you score too quick, your defense is out there too long and gets tired by the end of the game. It seems to me that not only has CNS not bought into reacting to extreme to what D he is uses against the spread, but he wants on offense that controls the ball. The spread O has a tendency to wear out its own D if they do not pace themselves.
Last edited: