I’m looking forward to the release of the text message where one of them relays that they told Trump, “We got Houthi” and he asked if they also killed the blowfish.
Signal is allegedly encrypt end-to-end, but that is useless if you invite some guy named JG (or V Putin) into your chat.I have to wonder what was the purpose of this chat meeting in the first place?
Was it just a bunch of trump fanboyz basking in their own imagined importance? (and why not trump)
Why was the Treasury secretary included?
Why didn't someone such as CIA director or National Security Advisor question who the unknown participant JG was? -or-
Why wasn't this done on a much more secure platform?
Appears to be an incompetant group gathered for nothing more than a ***********!
I'd like to know a bit more about what she did and why they took her into custody.![]()
Tufts international graduate student taken into ICE custody
The student was reportedly detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials and remains in federal custody, according to an email sent by the university Tuesday evening.www.wgbh.org
I read where Hegseth's being called WhiskeyLeaks now. I think that's prety funny.Der Spiegel has now found the passwords and personal data online of Hegseth, Waltz and Gabbard.
![]()
Der Spiegel reporting that Hegseth, Gabbard, and Waltz cell numbers/passwords for sale on web
www.spiegel.de/… Unfortunately, I can’t get an English version not behind a firewall. Donald Trump's top security advisors discussed a military strike via Signal chat. SPIEGEL research now reveals that the problem is even bigger. Cell phone numbers of...www.dailykos.com
I will bet you Hegseth’s password is Its5o’clocksomewhere
I read where Hegseth's being called WhiskeyLeaks now. I think that's prety funny.
DHS spokesman released a statement.![]()
Tufts international graduate student taken into ICE custody
The student was reportedly detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials and remains in federal custody, according to an email sent by the university Tuesday evening.www.wgbh.org
This was called an apartment building in the text, so I would assume at least 4 different apartments and probably a lot more than 4 apartments. I get blowing up a house and if the next two houses have damage, so be it. But dozens of civilians, if not far more, were probably killed for one guy? That's despicable.Yeah, I know.
The Law of Armed Conflict is pretty clear: aim for the combatant and if others get hurt, that is unfortunate and not intended, but their are still dead.
The US (and Europeans) have added a collateral damage (CD) risk assessment. How important is the target? How many noncombatants are likely to die if we proceed with the strike (and the answer is not "no strike unless we can guarantee no civilians casualties" because adopting that as the standard would mean unethical combatants would just set up facilities under schools)? Is the target worth the CD?
In Serbia in 1999, European countries were extremely risk averse when it came to CD. The US were more willing to accept the CD risk.
Yes, but we do not know the local circumstances. Maybe the apartment building was unoccupied because the rocket-maker's girlfriend. Who knows?This was called an apartment building in the text, so I would assume at least 4 different apartments and probably a lot more than 4 apartments. I get blowing up a house and if the next two houses have damage, so be it. But dozens of civilians, if not far more, were probably killed for one guy? That's despicable.
I suspect if we knew the number of innocent people killed by our government over the last few decades we'd burn DC to the ground.This was called an apartment building in the text, so I would assume at least 4 different apartments and probably a lot more than 4 apartments. I get blowing up a house and if the next two houses have damage, so be it. But dozens of civilians, if not far more, were probably killed for one guy? That's despicable.
There has been no proof that she broke any laws. Just having a political view, even writing about that political view, is not against the law. So far, this is a clear violation of the 1st amendment but Dictator Trump and his supporters don’t care.DHS spokesman released a statement.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said: "Rumeysa Ozturk is a Turkish national and Tufts University graduate student, granted the privilege to be in this country on a visa. DHS and ICE investigations found Ozturk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization that relishes the killing of Americans. A visa is a privilege not a right. Glorifying and supporting terrorists who kill Americans is grounds for visa issuance to be terminated. This is commonsense security."
"Hope for peace for the Palestinian people, fine. Praise Hamas? Here's your ticket home. Buh-bye."
Of course they would but honestly, this whole Signal screwup doesn’t surprise me. Of course this administration is playing loosey goosey with classified information. I mean the president himself stole boxes of classified documents and stored them in unsecured rooms in his beach mansion. Monkey see, monkey do.Btw, maybe l missed this in all the postings in the last 48 hours, but this one stood out to me upon release of the messages: where was Donald Trump on this chat about bombing Yemen?
Ok, l know the legit response is going to be that he was aware of it and had made the alpha manly decision and turned the execution of it to the frat house of Oui Kappa Knee……but why do l somehow suspect that if this was the last guy then this would be another “he’s not even involved” story?