We played UConn soooooooo much closer.
We played UConn soooooooo much closer.
Monday Night Raw for me. Very entertaining night after Wrestlemania show. Based on this thread and what I've seen from Pur-don't, the level of athleticism was probably higher too. Score suggests a plodding, clumsy affair.I’m watching American Idol. And it’s horrible. But better than watching Lurch v Klingon
I was just fixing to say after this game, we should at least be second when thd final poll comes out lolYep, that was what I was going to post. We gave them much more of a challenge.
My thing with officiating is let both teams know early on how the game will be called with actionable examples. Don’t call it differently on one end of the floor and completely different on the other. Is that too much to ask? I think not. RTR
I was just fixing to say after this game, we should at least be second when thd final poll comes out lol
They are pretty good with keeping teams around their final tournament finishes. This team she be no lower than 4th in the polls. I'll make a tough argument for 2nd but I'm sure Purdue will get that spot.They should at least jump us up to somewhere in the Top 4-8 at worst.
Last year they jumped all 4 Final Four teams like 12+ spots and FAU and SDSU jumped like 16-20 spots.
We were already in the Top 20.
I'll be close to Livid if we aren't around or in the Top 4 after playing UConn tougher than anyone.
They are pretty good with keeping teams around their final tournament finishes. This team she be no lower than 4th in the polls. I'll make a tough argument for 2nd but I'm sure Purdue will get that spot.
On the officiating issue. I think officiating is highlighted in our games because of 2 reasons:We just didn't have the right pieces this year to be great on Off and Def.
Last year we were 20th in Off Eff and 3rd in Def Eff but imo we we're derailed by the off the court distractions and a few lingering injuries situations.
This year we were 2nd in Off Eff but 111th in Def Eff.
We just fell off a cliff on Defense.
I don't think it's scheme though.
We might need to fine tune some things to create a better balance but we mostly need a couple pieces to be able to do it.
It really hurt losing some of the guys who left early and transferred.
We need at least 1 rim protector that can add something on Offense as a plus.
We could also use a True PG that can consistently drive and finish as well as distribute.
I don't think we are too far from putting it all together.
It's honestly amazing we went as far as we did with such a drop off on Defense.
But back to the point I think we can have both a Great Off and Def with the pace we play because last year showed that.
What we can do about the Officiating I have no clue because it's very rare for us to get fair or favorable calls.
We get absolutely hosed on the road and it makes it virtually impossible for us to win Road SEC games against the Top teams.
But even at Coleman we have zero advantage from the stripes. It's maddening and it's always been like this.
I guess we'll know when we reach 'Blueblood' status when we don't get worked at home and catch some questionable breaks...lol
It’s almost worse when they don’t call the fouls. Because we can’t get to the line.On the officiating issue. I think officiating is highlighted in our games because of 2 reasons:
1. Our pace of play. We expose ourselves to having more foul opportunities simply because we have to defend more offensive sets of our opponents. I suppose it's similar to fast paced offenses getting exposed more on defense because they are on the field more.
2. But I think the main thing is CNO's offensive philosophy involves 3 things: 3's, drives to the rim and getting FOULED and going to the line.
So 2 out of 3 of CNO's offensive principles depend on going into the lane and either finishing OR absorbing contact and getting a foul.
You combine our high paced style with this and there are just more whistles opportunities for the stripes. When they get "whistle happy" it seems to get out of hand.