Shapir & Miami remind me of the old saying, 'beauty is skin deep but ugly is to the bone'. This stuff cuts 'to the bone' in a very ugly fashion.
As always, because it's what the empirical evidence supports:
A) There is NEVER any means of accurately measuring the ncaa's response be it slap on the wrist for murder or 30 years hard labor for jay walking.
B) The ncaa goes after and gets who they want to, no matter what. They are investigator, judge, jury, and jailer. Which reminds me of another saying, 'nothing corrupts like power, and absolute power corrupts absolutely'.
C) Never ever forget points A or B because the ncaa is less reliable than a 35 year old Pinto in a rear-end collision.
No matter how 'dazzling' this case may be it still not much worse than what's gone on in several Big10/12 basketball programs involving head coach's involved in academic fraud, gifts of cash/vehicles, etc. It only slightly eclipses cases such as Tressel knowingly playing ineligable players. I don't care how you cut it, booster violations no matter how 'flashy' are a level below coach/institutional indiscretions. Oooops Miami had coach's shuttling players to and fro.

My point still stands though, booster violations are a notch below institutional violations though the ncaa rarely makes the distinction.
My prediction: Miami loses 1 scholarship and Alabama's probation period is extended by 2 years per former Miami coach hired!