Please. There are several team who have legitimate playmakers: Ohio State, Clemson, Oklahoma etc. I don't see a single player on offense between these 2 teams that can make an impact. It's kind of sad..
12/5 games of national importance catch-all thread
- Thread starter bama579
- Start date
Please. There are several team who have legitimate playmakers: Ohio State, Clemson, Oklahoma etc. I don't see a single player on offense between these 2 teams that can make an impact. It's kind of sad..
Either one of these teams would do very well in the SEC this season.
So you don't like them. Fine by me.
My comment doesn't have anything to do with the SEC. You brought that into it. Iowa and MSU are very good defensively but I'm just underwhelmed by the lack of playmakers on offense. It's kind of like if you were to watch Florida play Florida although I think Cook and the Iowa QB are at least serviceable. It's a shame that one of these 2 teams will be in the CFP and Ohio State likely won't. That's what I'm getting at..
USCw down to Stanford by 5 . . . 27 - 22. Color me surprised.
Thought the Cardinal would put them away by now.
Thought the Cardinal would put them away by now.
I guess my point is that Ohio State is a much more talented team than either of these. It's kind of weird to watch a conference championship game when the best team isn't in it..
We can relate. :wink: Big10-4Tide probably can, too.
Sparty leads 9- 6 . Start of Q4
Last edited:
If not for a miracle play by Arkansas the same thing would have happened in the SEC. I am fine with it. The only way to be sure is to win all of your games.
Ole Miss and Alabama are a lot closer in talent level than Ohio State and Iowa/Michigan State. Ole Miss has 3 or 4 first round draft picks. Probably more than Alabama has..
I seem to remember Alabama and LSU in a 9-6 game that was a lot better than the score indicated.
Whatever you are trying to do - it isn't working. I am more than content with how well my Buckeyes played this season, and happy for you that Alabama is in the playoff.
This comment is always confusing to me because people want to subjectively say one team is better than another based on the eye test instead of on field results. OSU had only one game on their schedule that people pointed to all season- Michigan St. Then, MSU did not even have their top QB. What did OSU do? They lost on the field to MSU. So, how are they better? Are they a better team based on possible NFL talent? Is that it? They were not better on the field, which is why they are sitting at home.
I don't want to derail this thread but c'mon man. The better team doesn't always win the game. Texas beat Oklahoma this year but does anyone think Texas is better than Oklahoma? Stuff like that happens every year. The best team doesn't always win the game..
No, but when they do so late in the season, it has to count as if they are better. You can't just look past a win like that. They trounced us.
Trending content
Latest threads
-
-
ESPN: Kiffin denies ultimatum by Ole Miss: 'Not true'- Started by TideFans Reporter
- Replies: 0
-
ESPN: Heisman Trophy race: Is Marcel Reed's comeback enough to beat Fernando Mendoza?
- Started by TideFans Reporter
- Replies: 0
-
-
The way too early discussion on whether Ty Simpson should return next season or enter the draft- Started by Bamabuzzard
- Replies: 26
-
ESPN: CFP Bubble Watch: Who's in? Who's out? Who's close before the third ranking?
- Started by TideFans Reporter
- Replies: 0