2016 Election - Clinton: The Hillary Clinton Thread

[Tide1986]

Or if they can drag out the lawsuit until the contractor goes bankrupt.

Very similar to DOJ practices.

 

[Tide1986]

If so, he seems to hire far fewer competent contractors than most in his business. I thought he had a good mind for these kinds of decisions?

I've seen my fair share of poor performing vendors both as a private customer and as a corporate officer responsible for engaging vendors for multi-million dollar deals.

 

[TideEngineer08]

Yet my point stands.

Yeah. Given the choice between death by a dull blade or death by a sharp blade I'm probably going to prefer the sharpest possible. Doesn't make either choice a good one, though.

 

[TideEngineer08]

like or dislike, "trust" or "distrust" it is still a race between competence and incompetence.

No, I see two bumbling fools, not just one. You've made the choice to be naive in favor of Party. Not me.

 

[tidegrandpa]

I assume you know that most businesses do not pay for substandard work or work that does not conform to contractual requirements.

The only leverage you have with contractors, the more it's used the more it's known among contractors and the pool of bidders improves.

 

[swoop10]

I assume you know that nearly 100% of politicians of any significance have been accused of being dishonest in one form or another. Unfortunately, it's the nature of things these days.

At the same time, 100% of businesses of significance don't brag about not paying bills.

Hillary has been a proven liar.

 

[TIDE-HSV]

Look, I'm not letting this mess about Trump being a poor, misunderstood but ethical businessman pass. His business ethics are lower than a snake's belly and he's freely admitted, as if there weren't enough proof strewn about. There's anew book out devoted to how he's made the money he has and it should be required reading for anyone considering him. Now, we don't usually enforce thread drift rules around here, but is it too much to ask to keep the Trump posts in the Trump thread and the Hillary posts in this thread?

 

[NationalTitles18]

Look, I'm not letting this mess about Trump being a poor, misunderstood but ethical businessman pass. His business ethics are lower than a snake's belly and he's freely admitted, as if there weren't enough proof strewn about. There's anew book out devoted to how he's made the money he has and it should be required reading for anyone considering him. Now, we don't usually enforce thread drift rules around here, but is it too much to ask to keep the Trump posts in the Trump thread and the Hillary posts in this thread?

But how else can we make (insert candidate's name here) look good?! We simply have to paint the other in a bad light for our candidate to look better! Because that's how we should choose the leader of the frickin' free world... (heavy blue font)

 

[crimsonaudio]

No, I see two bumbling fools, not just one. You've made the choice to be naive in favor of Party. Not me.

Make no mistake - Clinton is no bumbling fool. She knows precisely what it takes to play the game and will make herself and her husband unprecedented amounts of money as president.

 

[crimsonaudio]

Look, I'm not letting this mess about Trump being a poor, misunderstood but ethical businessman pass. His business ethics are lower than a snake's belly and he's freely admitted, as if there weren't enough proof strewn about.

He's bragged about cheating on his previous wives - if he'll screw his own wife over, who won't he screw over?

 

[TIDE-HSV]

He's bragged about cheating on his previous wives - if he'll screw his own wife over, who won't he screw over?

He's bragged about screwing over his subs also and there's a world of material on it, for anyone who has eyes to see. What we have are a bunch of people who are trying to alibi it, eyes tightly shut, fingers in ears, going "LALALALALAL" as loud as possible...

 

[TideEngineer08]

Make no mistake - Clinton is no bumbling fool. She knows precisely what it takes to play the game and will make herself and her husband unprecedented amounts of money as president.

I was actually being kind. If she isn't a bumbling fool, then she is extremely corrupt and is not fit for city council much less President.

 

[92tide]

No, I see two bumbling fools, not just one. You've made the choice to be naive in favor of Party. Not me.

good for you. why do you assume my choice is made via naivete? that is very presumptuous on your part.

regardless, one of the funnier things i have found over the years is how exasperated folks get when i don't agree with them on how evil they think [insert boogey person du jour] is

 

[92tide]

I was actually being kind. If she isn't a bumbling fool, then she is extremely corrupt and is not fit for city council much less President.

well a lot of folks disagree with you. but i guess they are all naive. in that case, you're screwed regardless

 

[CharminTide]

good for you. why do you assume my choice is made via naivete? that is very presumptuous on your part.

Because baaaaaaaa.

 

[TideEngineer08]

good for you. why do you assume my choice is made via naivete? that is very presumptuous on your part.

regardless, one of the funnier things i have found over the years is how exasperated folks get when i don't agree with them on how evil they think [insert boogey person du jour] is

Has to be naivete. You've expressed your belief that the Democrats are the only ones that actually "govern" and also that their policies are the best ones. That, to me, says I'm going to vote for this side no matter who the person is.

I find your approach to this election to be no different than those Trump-bots who are doing as TIDE-HSV said just above your post. You are ignoring the reality of a truly abhorrent woman, the worst of what Washington D.C. vomits out on the population, because Democrat.

As to your other post about me being screwed, you are no doubt correct that a lot of people do disagree with my take just as you do. I do believe, however, that I would be correct in saying that most Americans do not.

 

[Tide1986]

Has to be naivete. You've expressed your belief that the Democrats are the only ones that actually "govern" and also that their policies are the best ones. That, to me, says I'm going to vote for this side no matter who the person is.

I find your approach to this election to be no different than those Trump-bots who are doing as TIDE-HSV said just above your post. You are ignoring the reality of a truly abhorrent woman, the worst of what Washington D.C. vomits out on the population, because Democrat.

As to your other post about me being screwed, you are no doubt correct that a lot of people do disagree with my take just as you do. I do believe, however, that I would be correct in saying that most Americans do not.

 

[TideEngineer08]

But you know, 92tide and CharminTide, as I am wont to do by not leaving everything on such a negative note, at least we can come together and join hands in agreement that Trump is horrible and none of us will be voting for him.

 

[92tide]

Has to be naivete. You've expressed your belief that the Democrats are the only ones that actually "govern" and also that their policies are the best ones. That, to me, says I'm going to vote for this side no matter who the person is.

I find your approach to this election to be no different than those Trump-bots who are doing as TIDE-HSV said just above your post. You are ignoring the reality of a truly abhorrent woman, the worst of what Washington D.C. vomits out on the population, because Democrat.

As to your other post about me being screwed, you are no doubt correct that a lot of people do disagree with my take just as you do. I do believe, however, that I would be correct in saying that most Americans do not.

bless your heart.

 

[TideEngineer08]

Guilty as charged.