New Danish Study Finds Masks Don’t Protect Wearers From COVID Infection | Jon Miltimore
“Researchers in Denmark reported on Wednesday that surgical masks did not protect the wearers against infection with the coronavirus in a large randomized clinical trial,†the New York Times reports. The study is perhaps the best scientific evidence to date on the efficacy of masks.fee.org
How about this one. 😂
Wanted to add that vaccines are about 70% effective preventing severe COVID illness even though they are no longer as good preventing illness.
A study that did not measure whether masks prevent infection but rather measured how the recommendation to wear a mask would prevent infection?
Let me help you out:
Mask of any variety reduce infection rates - more so if all potentially infected parties wear them.
A well fitting cloth mask significantly reduces risk of infection.
A surgical/medical mask that fits well does better.
And a well fitting N95 or equivalent does roughly as good or better.
COVID-19 Masks: Expert Tips for What You Should (and Shouldn’t) Do
Face masks remain crucial in preventing the spread of COVID-19, even with vaccine availability. The decision to wear masks depends on vaccination status, risk factors, and local hospitalizations. Medical N95, KN95, or KF94 masks offer the best protection.
Did face masks help fight COVID? Scientists want you to w...
Eris is now the most common variant in the U.S, making up 17 percent of all cases and as of August 8, it has been detected in more than 50 countries.
Effectiveness of Face Mask or Respirator Use in Indoor ...
This report describes face mask or respirator effectiveness in helping protect against COVID-19 infection.

Medical and infectious disease experts don't give two blanks about controlling anyone. They have much better things to do.
What they do want is to have and disseminate life saving knowledge.
Former physics professors and other who are not experts in disease - although potentially having knowledge and expertise that can contribute to understanding - are limited in what they can contribute - particularly if they have an agenda that pre-shapes their opinions and that causes them to wildly misinterpret the studies that exist and they cherry pick the studies that they believe make them more believable to their target audience (even when they in no way support their opinion).
And wildly misinterpreted studies that measure one thing and are claimed to measure something entirely different contribute nothing (except to what they actually did measure if the study is of good quality).
There really is no point in having this debate any more until and unless good studies that actually measure this question come out refuting the good studies that have been done to this point because it's clear at this point that masks do help prevent infection (based on scientific study).


