IDK about this.
1) Freeman’s teams play a lot more confident and competent than Kelly’s later ND teams.
2) Georgia had a competent quarterback playing in place of a turnover machine. I don’t think Carson Beck being in really changes the outcome. Where the game was lost was Kirby getting greedy at the end of the half and trusting Mike Bobo will save your offense
3) I think out of the four teams in the semis, ND might have the 2nd best resume. I have far more issues with PSU and Texas dodging tough schedules than I do ND. OSU barely gets by because they played Oregon twice and played Tennessee. Otherwise they aren’t that much different than the rest of the Final Four in playing weak competition
1. Kelly had ND in the championship in 2012. We will see how Freeman's career advances.
2. Just... no. This was that guy's first start ever. It's one thing to come off the bench later in the game against Texas and keep the momentum of the game going. It's quite another to make your first start in the playoffs. The game was lost because of turnovers and bad special teams play. If the guy that had started the previous 2 full seasons starts that game, then UGA probably wins by 10.
3. I do not necessarily disagree. It's still a poor resume.
Edited to add: By the way, I'm only responding to what I saw all over social media today, mocking Brian Kelly's statement that he was leaving ND so that he could compete for a title, and oh boy, look at what Freeman has done this year?! Well... Kelly
already accomplished this at ND.
His point was, reaching the title game at ND actually go you no closer to winning the championship that if you were at Indiana. Because you couldn't get the talent to truly compete with the elites of the SEC, and your schedule at ND is why you made it that far, not because you were great yourself.
So we will see how Freeman does vs. Ohio State/Texas. And the other side of this coin is NIL/Portal has changed the paradigm from what it was when Kelly fled south to LSU.