BREAKING Pac12 to P4: We back!

BamaFanatJSU

1st Team
Apr 24, 2008
749
364
87
Rainbow City, AL
That was my thought when I saw this on the four letter network.
News outlets out of Texas are reporting that it's virtually a done deal, but the fact that Texas State actually took multiple days to consider the offer instead of immediately accepting speaks to just how little the vast majority of the college football world thinks of the PAC-whatever.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: DzynKingRTR and Con

DzynKingRTR

TideFans Legend
Dec 17, 2003
46,602
37,082
287
Vinings, ga., usa
News outlets out of Texas are reporting that it's virtually a done deal, but the fact that Texas State actually took multiple days to consider the offer instead of immediately accepting speaks to just how little the vast majority of the college football world thinks of the PAC-whatever.
It's like asking an ugly person out on a date and they took a few days to think about it.
 
Last edited:

PA Tide Fan

All-American
Dec 11, 2014
4,989
4,037
187
Lancaster, PA
They should call it the PAC-3 since there's only 3 teams (WSU,OSU and BSU) that have a legitimate chance of winning that conference for the foreseeable future.
 

BamaFanatJSU

1st Team
Apr 24, 2008
749
364
87
Rainbow City, AL
There should be a requirement that the conference champion autobid only applies if you are ranked in the top ten.
While I agree with the idea of a minimum ranking, perhaps it should be simply 'ranked', period. With the playoff field expanding to 16 teams, if a team from the non-P4 was ranked in the Top 10, they'd be in anyway. Requiring a Top 25 ranking might at least keep a 4-5 loss team that happens to win a conference title game over the one decent team in that otherwise-weak conference from backing into the playoff.
 

lowend

All-SEC
Feb 20, 2005
1,489
1,436
282
All of this mess could have been avoided had the NCAA simply enforced their own criteria for 1-A membership. Probably two-thirds of these have-nots should still be in 1-AA or D2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foreveratidefan

arthurdawg

1st Team
Sep 11, 2024
323
654
107
While I agree with the idea of a minimum ranking, perhaps it should be simply 'ranked', period. With the playoff field expanding to 16 teams, if a team from the non-P4 was ranked in the Top 10, they'd be in anyway. Requiring a Top 25 ranking might at least keep a 4-5 loss team that happens to win a conference title game over the one decent team in that otherwise-weak conference from backing into the playoff.
Works for me... Just something to keep a crappy 5 loss team from bumping us!

Our schedule is fiendish next year. 9-3 should be a play off trip unless we have really bad losses.
 

New Posts

TideFans.shop - 25% off Fan Favorites!

TideFans.shop - 25% off!

20oz Tervis Tumbler
20oz Tervis Tumbler from TideFansStore.com

Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads