BREAKING Pac12 to P4: We back!

That was my thought when I saw this on the four letter network.

News outlets out of Texas are reporting that it's virtually a done deal, but the fact that Texas State actually took multiple days to consider the offer instead of immediately accepting speaks to just how little the vast majority of the college football world thinks of the PAC-whatever.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: DzynKingRTR and Con
News outlets out of Texas are reporting that it's virtually a done deal, but the fact that Texas State actually took multiple days to consider the offer instead of immediately accepting speaks to just how little the vast majority of the college football world thinks of the PAC-whatever.

It's like asking an ugly person out on a date and they took a few days to think about it.
 
Last edited:
They should call it the PAC-3 since there's only 3 teams (WSU,OSU and BSU) that have a legitimate chance of winning that conference for the foreseeable future.
 
There should be a requirement that the conference champion autobid only applies if you are ranked in the top ten.

While I agree with the idea of a minimum ranking, perhaps it should be simply 'ranked', period. With the playoff field expanding to 16 teams, if a team from the non-P4 was ranked in the Top 10, they'd be in anyway. Requiring a Top 25 ranking might at least keep a 4-5 loss team that happens to win a conference title game over the one decent team in that otherwise-weak conference from backing into the playoff.
 
All of this mess could have been avoided had the NCAA simply enforced their own criteria for 1-A membership. Probably two-thirds of these have-nots should still be in 1-AA or D2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foreveratidefan
While I agree with the idea of a minimum ranking, perhaps it should be simply 'ranked', period. With the playoff field expanding to 16 teams, if a team from the non-P4 was ranked in the Top 10, they'd be in anyway. Requiring a Top 25 ranking might at least keep a 4-5 loss team that happens to win a conference title game over the one decent team in that otherwise-weak conference from backing into the playoff.

Works for me... Just something to keep a crappy 5 loss team from bumping us!

Our schedule is fiendish next year. 9-3 should be a play off trip unless we have really bad losses.
 
To be sure that the PAC12 / 4 / 9 / land grant conference gets its proper recognition....
Here's the headline today:


Not sure I could find CW on my provider even if you paid me $1000.
 
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads