Agreed 100%. Per Grok here are some policy links. Looks like the Dean of Students can suspend if warranted.
My view is being charged with a felony drug charge warrants...
- The University of Alabama's handling of students charged with felonies (or other criminal offenses) under the **Code of Student Conduct**:
1. **Official Code of Student Conduct** (main policy document)
- Direct link: https://studentconduct.sl.ua.edu/student-code
- Alternative hosted version: https://ua-public.policystat.com/policy/14672109/latest
This is the core governing document administered by the Office of Student Conduct. It covers jurisdiction over off-campus behavior, the separate university process (using preponderance of evidence), possible sanctions (including suspension and expulsion), and more.
2. **Self-Disclosure of Arrests and Convictions** (requirement to report within 7 days)
- Explicitly stated in the Code: Students must disclose any arrests or convictions (excluding minor traffic violations) to the Office of Student Conduct within 7 calendar days to ensure community safety and security.
- Full policy PDF (archived/mirrored version from Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, dated Feb 4, 2025, reflecting current rules): https://www.fire.org/sites/default/files/2025/04/UA-Code of Student Conduct.pdf
- This matches the university's emphasis on self-reporting for criminal matters, including felonies.
3. **Interim Measures / Interim Suspension** (immediate actions for serious cases like felonies involving safety risks)
- Detailed page: https://studentconduct.sl.ua.edu/sanctions/student-conduct-process/interim-measures
- Interim measures (e.g., temporary separation/suspension) can be imposed to protect the community, ensure safety, or prevent disruption—common for violent or serious felony-level charges. A student can request review.
4. **Office of Student Conduct Main Site** (overall process, reporting, sanctions, jurisdiction)
- https://studentconduct.sl.ua.edu/
- Includes FAQs, policies/procedures, and contact info. Explains that the university can act independently of criminal proceedings.
5. **Policies and Procedures Overview** (additional context on sanctions, holds, etc.)
- https://studentconduct.sl.ua.edu/policies-and-procedures
- Covers registration holds during investigations/suspensions, common sanctions, and student responsibilities to know the Code.
6. **Student Handbook Reference** (links back to the Code)
- https://studenthandbook.sl.ua.edu/student-policies
- Reinforces that the Code applies to promote a safe environment.
These are all directly from UA's official websites or reliable mirrors of their policies (last revised/approved as of early 2025, with no major changes indicated in recent crawls).
Looks like #3 is the salient point. A student charged with a felony
can be suspended. Not that the student
will be suspended. Afterward, the student can request a review. I'm guessing who or what body conducts the review would be spelled out in the detailed document.
Regardless, I think that's too weak.
I'd say the student will be suspended immediately. Then the student can ask the President for a review / exemption. Not a committee. Not a board. Not a bunch of Deans or a random jury consisting of representatives of an infinite number of "stakeholder groups." The President alone.
Then, should the Chairperson of the UA Board of Trustees choose to do so, he or she can countermand the President's decision. That would apply whether the President decides to suspend or not. Again, not the BoT as a whole....the Chair. Whatever he or she decides is final.
At that point, further appeal would be to the courts, not University governance.
The level of appeal is intentionally high because the level of the threat to innocent students, faculty and staff is likewise high. Extensive time writing policy in the banking world taught me that the higher the level of appeal, (1) the less often it tends to be used, and (2) when it is used, the grounds for appeal tend to be much more persuasive.
Also having spent a long time in the loan approval process, I also found that when an
individual has to make a decision like this, they're a lot more considered than when they have the skirts of a group to hide behind. IOW, if it blows up they can't say, "I didn't decide.....the Committee did. I was just one vote."
This way, the President and the Chair of the BoT can consult with anybody they want. But theirs are the names on the line.