-- STOP HILLARY -- Video

[Bama Reb]

He tried but unfortunately he has failed miserably. History rewards good results, not this. History will religate 43 to the bottom of the pile. The 1st 6 years have been a failure. He better get moving if he wants to be viewed positively by history.

It is only your politically charged hatred that blinds you from seeing the positive results yielded from his administration. It doesn't matter what he says or does, you will hate and criticize him for no other reason than his party affiliation. If you were to ever step away from your liberal bias and look from a different angle you might be able to see things a little more clearly.

 

[92tide]

maybe bamaro should be sent to re-education camp so he knows the acceptable way to think about dear leader

 

[NYBamaFan]

maybe bamaro should be sent to re-education camp so he knows the acceptable way to think about dear leader

LOL - are you volunteering to go with him?

 

[92tide]

i'll stick with self treatment and go home and stick my finger in a light socket :biggrin2:

 

[Bamaro]

It is only your politically charged hatred that blinds you from seeing the positive results yielded from his administration. It doesn't matter what he says or does, you will hate and criticize him for no other reason than his party affiliation. If you were to ever step away from your liberal bias and look from a different angle you might be able to see things a little more clearly.

Please educate me on "the positive results yielded from his administration."
Balancing the budget - nope
Protecting us from terrorism - nope
Well designed prescription drug plan - nope
Being truthful about why we invaded Iraq - nope
Being correct on the costs and aftermath of Iraq - nope
Well designed Iraq battle plan - OK, I'll give you that one
Well designed plan for after the fall of Bagdad - nope
Integrity in the administration - nope
Following through with Afghanistan - nope
Dealing with drugs now flowing out of Afghanistan - nope
Iran - nope
N K - nope
nope, nope, nope

I have no problem with his "party affiliation". I'll bet you that I have voted for more republicans than you have but incompetence is incompetence. We are seeing the worst administration in my lifetime and I have seen more than most of you.

 

[NYBamaFan]

Balancing the budget - nope - agreed
Protecting us from terrorism - nope - totally disagree
Well designed prescription drug plan - nope - the government need to but out completely
Being truthful about why we invaded Iraq - nope - totally disagree
Being correct on the costs and aftermath of Iraq - nope - agreed
Well designed Iraq battle plan - OK, I'll give you that one - agreed
Well designed plan for after the fall of Bagdad - nope - agreed
Integrity in the administration - nope - disagree
Following through with Afghanistan - nope - disagree
Dealing with drugs now flowing out of Afghanistan - nope - agree
Iran - nope - libs will not allow him to do what he wants to do
N K - nope - let's see how this new plan works out

Economy - huge success
Unemployment - couldn't be better
War on terrorism - had the guts to start it
Social Services - wasted opportunity to end them while he controlled the executive and legislative branches
Social Security reform - see above

 

[It's On A Slab]

Please educate me on "the positive results yielded from his administration."
Balancing the budget - nope
Protecting us from terrorism - nope
Well designed prescription drug plan - nope
Being truthful about why we invaded Iraq - nope
Being correct on the costs and aftermath of Iraq - nope
Well designed Iraq battle plan - OK, I'll give you that one
Well designed plan for after the fall of Bagdad - nope
Integrity in the administration - nope
Following through with Afghanistan - nope
Dealing with drugs now flowing out of Afghanistan - nope
Iran - nope
N K - nope
nope, nope, nope

I have no problem with his "party affiliation". I'll bet you that I have voted for more republicans than you have but incompetence is incompetence. We are seeing the worst administration in my lifetime and I have seen more than most of you.

Environment: Big fat sloppy, greasy, clear-cut, polluted, smoggy, fishkill, strip-mined, fuel-inefficient NOPE.

Flat Earth & Young Earth junk science: Yup, yup, yup.

 

[Bama Torch in Pcola]

Environment: Big fat sloppy, greasy, clear-cut, polluted, smoggy, fishkill, strip-mined, fuel-inefficient NOPE.

Flat Earth & Young Earth junk science: Yup, yup, yup.

C'mon now! You're just piling on.

 

[cbi1972]

Clinton Slams Bush, White House in Harlem

Sen. Hillary Clinton on Monday blasted the Bush administration as "one of the worst" in U.S. history and compared the Republican-controlled House of Representatives to a plantation where dissenting voices are squelched.

.... Clinton also offered an apology to a group of Hurricane Katrina survivors "on behalf of a government that left you behind, that turned its back on you." Her remarks were met with thunderous applause by a mostly black audience at the Canaan Baptist Church of Christ in Harlem.

The House "has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talking about," said Clinton, D-N.Y. "It has been run in a way so that nobody with a contrary view has had a chance to present legislation, to make an argument, to be heard."

This sort of pandering is without equal.

 

[NYBamaFan]

This sort of pandering is without equal.

This is disgusting. And the listeners are just stupid enough to applaud. Yep, Bush is bad for minorities, and Hillary offers them a new hope. Heck, it is amazing that any blacks even survived the last 6 years.

And they are buying it hook, line, and sinker...

 

[Bamaro]

Protecting us from terrorism - nope - totally disagree

Being truthful about why we invaded Iraq - nope - totally disagree

Well, 911 fell on his watch and it is well documented that the administration had virtually no concerns about terrorism until AFTER 911. I'm not saying he could have prevented 911 but he did NOTHING to prevent it.

Where are WMDs? Dont tell me Syria or Iran unless you show proof. Even the administration, and certainly the 911 commission and any other commission that has studied it agree that we had Saddam in a box. He was a paper tiger.

 

[NYBamaFan]

Well, 911 fell on his watch and it is well documented that the administration had virtually no concerns about terrorism until AFTER 911. I'm not saying he could have prevented 911 but he did NOTHING to prevent it.

This clearly shows how irrational you are about Bush. If anyone is to blame for 9/11, it is the terrorists. If any administration is to be blamed for 9/11, it is Clinton's

Where are WMDs? Dont tell me Syria or Iran unless you show proof. Even the administration, and certainly the 911 commission and any other commission that has studied it agree that we had Saddam in a box. He was a paper tiger.

Saying that he was wrong is not even close to saying that he lied. I think that you are wrong about Global Warming, but I do not accuse you of lying.

 

[Bamaro]

Saying that he was wrong is not even close to saying that he lied. I think that you are wrong about Global Warming, but I do not accuse you of lying.

At first I believed, like you, that he was simply wrong. Now, IMO, the administration intentionally misled us. For example, it is reported that the information provided by curveball was known to be wrong and that curveball was untrustworthy but the administration still chose to use that as one justification for invasion.
If you have the time, read the 1st couple of chapters of Fiasco. It may change your mind.

 

[Bama Torch in Pcola]

At first I believed, like you, that he was simply wrong. Now, IMO, the administration intentionally misled us. For example, it is reported that the information provided by curveball was known to be wrong and that curveball was untrustworthy but the administration still chose to use that as one justification for invasion.
If you have the time, read the 1st couple of chapters of Fiasco. It may change your mind.

I plan on reading it, although judging by the title I don't believe it's going to be 100% "fair and balanced". If you look at it logically how can you not think Saddam had the WMD's. He HAD used them before quite extensively. And he was jerking the UN around concerning the inspectors.

 

[cbi1972]

And he was jerking the UN around concerning the inspectors.

Saddam violated the terms of the cease fire flagrantly and repeatedly. This fact alone justifies military action, regardless of whether there were any actual WMDs, and regardless of any other political rhetoric which might have been used to soft-pedal the controversial decision.

 

[Bama Reb]

Well, 911 fell on his watch and it is well documented that the administration had virtually no concerns about terrorism until AFTER 911. I'm not saying he could have prevented 911 but he did NOTHING to prevent it.

Where are WMDs? Dont tell me Syria or Iran unless you show proof. Even the administration, and certainly the 911 commission and any other commission that has studied it agree that we had Saddam in a box. He was a paper tiger.

:conf2: I think we both agree then, that he couldn't have prevented 9/11, so that is moot.
Don't bring up his pursuit of WMD's when virtually EVERY DEMOCRAT in the House and Senate, including John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton spoke up time and time again, proclaiming that they obviously existed, and that we must remove them and Saddam Hussein in the process. GWB acted on information he was provided by his intelligence sources.

 

[Bama Reb]

Please educate me on "the positive results yielded from his administration.".......I have no problem with his "party affiliation". I'll bet you that I have voted for more republicans than you have but incompetence is incompetence. We are seeing the worst administration in my lifetime and I have seen more than most of you.

I look in the mirror and see these gray hairs on my head, remembering how each one was earned and nurtured over the past half century, and then some. Those combined with the consistently liberal views you espouse on a regular basis give me great doubts as to the validity of your claim.

 

[Bamaro]

:conf2:
Don't bring up his pursuit of WMD's when virtually EVERY DEMOCRAT in the House and Senate, including John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton spoke up time and time again, proclaiming that they obviously existed, and that we must remove them and Saddam Hussein in the process. GWB acted on information he was provided by his intelligence sources.

Yes because the democrats were fed the 'misinformation' about WMDs that the administration cherry picked and gave to them. The administration was in the position to see ALL the intelligence and chose to only use what they wanted. The press rolled over on this one fearing to be viewed as un-American because 911 was still too fresh in everyone's minds.

"GWB acted on information he was provided by his intelligence sources." He only acted on some of the information.

 

[NYBamaFan]

Yes because the democrats were fed the 'misinformation' about WMDs that the administration cherry picked and gave to them. The administration was in the position to see ALL the intelligence and chose to only use what they wanted. The press rolled over on this one fearing to be viewed as un-American because 911 was still too fresh in everyone's minds.

"GWB acted on information he was provided by his intelligence sources." He only acted on some of the information.

Dude, your memory is decidedly selective. Your age is beginning to show. The Democrats (along with the Republicans, and the entire world) were saying this long before GWB ever entered the national landscape. Most of the intelligence used to make the decision to invade was gathered before Bush took office.

Your credibility is taking a backwards slide with these Michael Moore like posts...

 

[Tide&True]

Dude, your memory is decidedly selective. Your age is beginning to show. The Democrats (along with the Republicans, and the entire world) were saying this long before GWB ever entered the national landscape. Most of the intelligence used to make the decision to invade was gathered before Bush took office.

Your credibility is taking a backwards slide with these Michael Moore like posts...

Yeah, the Democrats (when in office) get us into things that the Republicans have to fix when they come into office. As a results of doing the hard things the Democrates would never do while in office the Republicans wind up getting bumped out of office again. It is a vicious cycle that has been going on for years. Now it appears the Dems will come back into power because they will use the lack of popular support for the war in Iraq to beat us over the head. If the Dems remained in power after Clinton I'm sure we would have already had more attacks like 911....why?...because the appropriate measures wouldn't have been taken to defeat the enemy.