I'll play devil's advocate. I think whoever is prosecuting this is trying to reach to get the conviction on Vick. Sure it was his house, but who's to say he didn't know what was going on in one of his many houses.
I mean when you provide for a lot of people like I am sure he is doing, for those in his family and entourage, it's hard for him to know what everyone is doing at all times. Can they get a conviction for guilty by something his cousin was doing at his house? We'll have to wait and see. I'm gonna wait for more facts.
Now if he was never at a dog fight nor knew what was going on at the house, then I don't think he should be convicted. If not, then let the law dictate what his punishment will be.
I think the Falcons stand by him until the facts come out.
you really need to read the indictment. it's by no means a "reach" for them to indict vick. federal prosecutors usually don't seek indictments if they are not solidly sure they will get a conviction. vick's name and fingerprints are all over this thing. i think he's going to go down...and go down hard.
one of the allegations, and if proven, will destroy him forever...the allegation that not only did vick and his entourage kill animals that were not "game" enough to fight, but that they killed at least one of them by slamming it repeatedly into the ground until it was dead. in other words, they beat it to death with their bare hands.
if this is true, it's nothing short of barbarism. if he's found guilty, he should be banned from the nfl for life with absolutely no possibility of reinstatement and the team should make every effort to recoup every penny from him that they can.
i've seen a good bit of "PETA is the KGB" nonsense on here. well, if PETA's the KGB, then the people who do this kind of stuff to animals are what...the devil incarnate?
and as for the falcons should "wait and see what happens in court" talk...i think that's all, as they say in the military, a bunch of bravo sierra. whether he was directly involved in the operation (which it appears quite clear that he was), as the owner of the house, he has a duty to know what is going on there. the league does not (and should not) require that one is convicted before they are reprimanded. it's a private membership organization that can regulate its members as it sees fit.
whether he's directly involved, there's enough evidence to show that as the owner of the house, he allowed things to take place on his property that any reasonably prudent property owner would discover. at the very least it shows that he is totally irresponsible and couldn't care less whether his property was being used for horrible criminal activity. we're not talking about him lending a car to a buddy one time, and that buddy gets into some trouble. we're talking about a guy who owned a house for several years which is located only a few miles from his home town. he's never said he never went there. he's never said he's never seen the place. were those black outbuildings erected without his consent or even his knowledge? wouldn't you notice a compound of black outbuildings surrounded by a privacy fence on your own land? wouldn't you at least inquire among the tenants as to what the nature of this compound was on your property?
whether he was directly involved is one matter that can be fairly debated. whether he knew or should have known that something illegal was going on is quite another, and likely not one upon which reasonable minds can differ.
to this point, he's on the hook for his willful ignorance at least. that's enough for the team and the league to punish him. with all the money and exposure he has comes responsibility...of which to this point he's has shown himself to be completely devoid.