In nautical parlance, "Eight Bells" is the end of a four-hour watch. It's also a nautical euphemism for the death of a sailor: his watch is over, eternally.
LOUISVILLE -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, entering the home stretch of her own close political horse race, revealed her sentimental choice for Saturday's Run for the Roses, the filly Eight Belles, a long shot.
"I want everybody to place a little money on the filly," Clinton told cheering supporters at her campaign headquarters in Louisville. In Wednesday's morning line, the filly was listed at 20-1 odds.
Brought back memories of Ruffian & Barbaro:frown:
Not sure what happened to Eight Belles. Given the normal stresses placed on individual legs, how do both legs fracture at the roughly the same time?
Big horse with a big heart.
I don't think they should allow fillies to race against the boys. It's like letting them suit up for football or something. It's unfair to them.
IMO.
These quacks that want to ban horse racing have no idea what goes on in the industry, nor do they know anything about the animals themselves. The chorus has already started.
Racehorses live a pampered (if perilous) life.
If they survive their racing career, it's a great gig. Nothing to do but play in the pasture and sire offspring. Sure beats gelding, French cuisine and/or the glue factory.
Horses break their legs just running around in pastures, so I don't know what the big deal is.
It varies. After their racing careers are over, they are often sold as regular riding horses. A friend of mine had a TB mare (from Secretariat's lineage) that supposedly "broke" under the stress of racing; she trained the horse for dressage and cross country, bred a couple of foals out of her, and had her for ~10 years.The best ones do. I doubt it is so good in the lower echelons of racing.
Horses break their legs just running around in pastures, so I don't know what the big deal is.
Biases implicit in the availability heuristic affect estimates of risk. A pioneering study by Lichtenstein et. al. (1978) examined absolute and relative probability judgments of risk. People know in general terms which risks cause large numbers of deaths and which cause few deaths. However, asked to quantify risks more precisely, people severely overestimate the frequency of rare causes of death, and severely underestimate the frequency of common causes of death. Other repeated errors were also apparent: Accidents were judged to cause as many deaths as disease. (Diseases cause about 16 times as many deaths as accidents.) Homicide was incorrectly judged a more frequent cause of death than diabetes, or stomach cancer. A followup study by Combs and Slovic (1979) tallied reporting of deaths in two newspapers, and found that errors in probability judgments correlated strongly (.85 and .89) with selective reporting in newspapers.