They got rolled by Georgia in the SEC Championship, were meh against Auburn, and should've lost to South Carolina. Take the scrimmage against Eastern Illinois out of the equation, and they haven't played well in two months.
Again, I'm not quite sure what games these folks were actually watching.
Georgia, okay, but most of the UGA issue was the offense turning it over with short fields. A very good 1991 Alabama defense got blown out by Florida in 1991. That game was a 35-0 blowout on the scoreboard, but it didn't really feel like it until the end. We had six fumbles (losing 3) and threw 2 INTs (a total of 5 turnovers). EVEN STEVE SPURRIER - that bastion of Christian kindness and humility - said, "It certainly was a lot closer than 35-0" and stated his respect for the Tide defense. There ARE games like that where the score belies what the game truly was - in both directions.
Alabama never trailed in the Auburn game, and 130 of their yards (and as a result both of their TDs) came as a result of the same guy making two plays.
And where does this "should have lost to South Carolina" come from?
Alabama was 8 points behind ON THE ROAD in the SEC and took 7:44 of the last 10 minutes off the clock with a pressure-packed successful drive and two-point PAT. They then forced a fumble and scored the game-winning TD.
Would this guy say the Aggies "should have lost to South Carolina"? Or is this proof of their courage and valor? I'm curious.
Again, I'm not quite sure what games these folks were actually watching.
Georgia, okay, but most of the UGA issue was the offense turning it over with short fields. A very good 1991 Alabama defense got blown out by Florida in 1991. That game was a 35-0 blowout on the scoreboard, but it didn't really feel like it until the end. We had six fumbles (losing 3) and threw 2 INTs (a total of 5 turnovers). EVEN STEVE SPURRIER - that bastion of Christian kindness and humility - said, "It certainly was a lot closer than 35-0" and stated his respect for the Tide defense. There ARE games like that where the score belies what the game truly was - in both directions.
Alabama never trailed in the Auburn game, and 130 of their yards (and as a result both of their TDs) came as a result of the same guy making two plays.
And where does this "should have lost to South Carolina" come from?
Alabama was 8 points behind ON THE ROAD in the SEC and took 7:44 of the last 10 minutes off the clock with a pressure-packed successful drive and two-point PAT. They then forced a fumble and scored the game-winning TD.
Would this guy say the Aggies "should have lost to South Carolina"? Or is this proof of their courage and valor? I'm curious.
