ICE Officer Kills Motorist In Minneapolis

Of course, this murdering thug didn't follow procedures. This idiot ICE agent was too busy walking around the car recording a video with his phone, screw policies. He is still holding his phone when he draws his weapon and commits the crime. He was distracted and ended up killing someone because of it. If you are distracted by your phone and kill someone, will you be able to drive away from the scene of the crime? Nope, and neither should this thug.

If he is too traumatized because of a previous incident with a car, then maybe he shouldn't be on the streets anymore. I'm tired of trigger-happy LEOs in this country. All these policies and procedures mean nothing when they are rarely held accountable for breaking them.
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

George Orwell, 1984
 
  • Thank You
  • Emphasis!
Reactions: Bamaro and UAH
"Officials said 64-year-old Harold Harper was killed in a random act of violence while he was gardening."


Sorry but I'll mourn the loss of this man WAY more than the mother of a young child who was left behind in child care so she could put herself into conflict with armed Federal agents.

Harold was in his OWN yard - minding his own business. Gardening, no less!

:cry:
No concrete evidence has emerged in the very short time since the shooting on why she was there.
 
If only MN had handled it like this:

Chicago PD Superintendent Larry Snelling:

“Let me make this clear; agents, ICE, HSI, are officers, they are agents of law enforcement. If you box them in with vehicles, it is reasonable for them to believe, that they are being ambushed…”


Kinda surprised to hear this coming from Chicago, but there it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Con
They have released the bodycam footage from the officer who shot the woman.

Not linking it here as I've not been able to listen to the audio so I'm not sure if there's any language.

I'm guessing the tribes will view this without it changing their mind, but she doesn't appear flustered whatsoever.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: Con and CrimsonJazz
They have released the bodycam footage from the officer who shot the woman.

Not linking it here as I've not been able to listen to the audio so I'm not sure if there's any language.

I'm guessing the tribes will view this without it changing their mind, but she doesn't appear flustered whatsoever.
Everyone seems to be putting their own spin/interpretation on the new video. Unfortunately, there is inappropriate language in it, but the video is easy to find.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: crimsonaudio
They have released the bodycam footage from the officer who shot the woman.

Not linking it here as I've not been able to listen to the audio so I'm not sure if there's any language.

I'm guessing the tribes will view this without it changing their mind, but she doesn't appear flustered whatsoever.
I listened to it and it is decidedly not within the board rules. I imagine it's all over X by now, so it shouldn't be hard to find. It took me all of about 15 seconds. My biggest takeaway: the idea that she didn't see him because she was distracted by the officer to her left is no longer a valid hypothesis. She was looking right at the guy.
 
I listened to it and it is decidedly not within the board rules. I imagine it's all over X by now, so it shouldn't be hard to find. It took me all of about 15 seconds. My biggest takeaway: the idea that she didn't see him because she was distracted by the officer to her left is no longer a valid hypothesis. She was looking right at the guy.

She's completely innocent. She just has (had) a stutter.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CrimsonJazz
They have released the bodycam footage from the officer who shot the woman.

Not linking it here as I've not been able to listen to the audio so I'm not sure if there's any language.

I'm guessing the tribes will view this without it changing their mind, but she doesn't appear flustered whatsoever.
Just for clarification, wasn't this video from his phone, not his body cam. I heard they generally dont have body cams.
 
Just for clarification, wasn't this video from his phone, not his body cam. I heard they generally dont have body cams.
If this is true, that leaves me with one question: WHY THE HELL NOT? Man, there is NO WAY I'm even leaving the house without my bodycam if I'm working in law enforcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry

And right on cue, the Keystone Kops(otherwise known as Ca$h Patel's FBI) moves in to prevent local LE from investigating the shootings.

I am sure this will all be skewed toward the weaponized-vehicle lie, um, narrative. Domestic terrorist.

The circus has become the dark carnival.
 
So, he was recording with his cellphone while brandishing his weapon--which is kind of stupid in and of itself. Focus on your surroundings, not your phone. Then he walks in front of a moving vehicle--which they are not supposed to do.

The woman bumps him while clearly attempting to leave. I say bump because he does not appear to be injured, and he was able to get a headshot.

But by all means, go ahead and use this video to validate your belief that the woman deserved to die.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: 92tide
So, he was recording with his cellphone while brandishing his weapon--which is kind of stupid in and of itself. Focus on your surroundings, not your phone. Then he walks in front of a moving vehicle--which they are not supposed to do.

The woman bumps him while clearly attempting to leave. I say bump because he does not appear to be injured, and he was able to get a headshot.

But by all means, go ahead and use this video to validate your belief that the woman deserved to die.
iirc, one of the dudes who murdered ahmaud aubrey shares video he took thinking it would completely exonerate him
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads