I don't know if he has to be. I described what to expected from Grubb (running DeBoer's system) heading into the season, and it was as predicted. I agree with you on the concerns and raised those issues. The problem was nothing was done to counter-balance the QB over-reliance.Many dont think Grubb capable of doing that.............i.e. Seattle before this year and Seattle now. If he is stubborn and sticks to his guns, then probably so, I dont think he is dumb but depending heavily on the QB isnt a great long term strategy
I think Grubb is a bit of a whipping boy in this scenario because he runs DeBoer's system and this is what DeBoer's system does.
In 2019 Grubb (without DeBoer) took over the Fresno State offense and they had 159 yards per game with an average of 4.9 (that same year DeBoer was calling plays for an offense that averaged 3.7 YPC, a year to year decline of .7 after he took over). That's not amazing, but that's a higher average than DeBoer ever managed and the only year DeBoer had more rushing yards was in 2024 when the QB accounted for 726. Deboer has had more offenses that average less than 4 YPC than Grubb has (assuming it's a tie when they're both there, this includes the Seahawks).
So, while I agree Grubb isn't the solution, he's also not the problem. It's the system and he does implement that system. Bringing in a new OC might fix the running issues, but then you have other problems in reverse. You might have an OC who does not fit the players DeBoer has assembled.
What I was hoping for was a change in the OL coach, but to someone that we know can coach run blocking well (half way there, there will be a change) and perhaps as importantly a run game coordinator. A run game coordinator can emphasize the run, and basically compliment what Grubb and DeBoer are doing.
It's fair to say that both DeBoer and Grubb can be neglectful of the run game, but just bring in someone who isn't to balance that.
Last edited:

