Which is the whole problem with this stupid rule. We've had Bama players tossed from games for less then that hit. The rule should be thrown out until they can figure out how to make it not a judgment call from idiot refs. It is called completely different between leagues, crews and even within the same game at times. The excuse for this rule is "player safety" but that hit literally knocked a player out but is deemed legal. Player safety my....
So you’re saying tOSU fans and Auburn fans are “twin sons from different delusional parents”, right?
I'll spot you. We have Alabama fans infatuated with that mythical pundit illness known as "da Bama fat-EEG is REAL!"
Olave is the real deal.
He’s as much of a candidate as Young is. I think neither win, this year
Agreed. Much of their future success will depend on Ibrahim’s injury. But, in that division they could run the table or only drop one more. OSU is the best team they'll play all year. Have to wait & see on the Gophers. They *seem* to be a quality team. Give props to the Buckeyes going on the road coming behind to beat them.
Most of us were giving Olave a lot of props during the Ohio State game threads last year. He might be a future Biletnikoff winner.
On the other hand, how many of those throws had a defender within 5 yards of the receiver?
True. From memory, most of his second half throws were to wide open WRs. But he did hit them in stride for the most part.
It's according to the context. With the CFPC, who's charge is to be impartial selectors, there is no Bama fatigue. In the media, Finebaum and others are fair, but not all. As far as many fans and some in the media there most definitely is "Bama fatigue". The media itself often acknowledges its existence - never even hinting that it does not exist. One article after another that refers to it could be cited. It's has almost become axiomatic, even Pinterest had a line about it, "Alabama fatigue becoming part of sports lexicon". Frankly, IMO, it's indisputable. Of course some of it may be simple anti-Bama bias.
.
Alabama fatigue is 100% fake amongst people that matter. I literally had a person tell me after Clemson beat the crap out of Locksley that Alabama would no longer get the benefit of the doubt. Had we beaten Auburn with mac Jones then LSU fans would have been fainting in the streaks because the CFP forced a rematch in Atlanta.It's according to the context. With the CFPC, who's charge is to be impartial selectors, there is no Bama fatigue. In the media, Finebaum and others are fair, but not all. As far as many fans and some in the media there most definitely is "Bama fatigue". The media itself often acknowledges its existence - never even hinting that it does not exist. One article after another that refers to it could be cited. It's has almost become axiomatic, even Pinterest had a line about it, "Alabama fatigue becoming part of sports lexicon". Frankly, IMO, it's indisputable. Of course some of it may be simple anti-Bama bias.
Do some Alabama fans see ghosts? Sure, but that's to be expected, especially since it's real, some will imagine things and think that everything that does not go their way or every criticism is because of Bama fatigue.
If I had not seen previous posts indicating the same thing, I would have thought you were kidding.
Alabama football has transcended not only college football but sports in general, so that it has contributed at least one idiom, "Bring on Bama", and one axiom, "Bama fatigue", to the English language
That sounds like LSU fans I’ve known. When I lived in Louisiana, if LSU won a fairly big game early in the season it was, “ OK, that’s it. National champs. “. It was really amusing.
And this is the key point that always has to be kept in mind. The comments to which I refer - and the most commonly used here - are the ones that insist we have to go undefeated or win the SEC or else the CFPC is going to make sure they don't select us "because the Bama fatigue is real."
