Okie dokie.No, I do not believe it is breaking the states. It is a convenient excuse. Does it add expenses? Of course. Is it breaking the states? Hardly.
Okie dokie.No, I do not believe it is breaking the states. It is a convenient excuse. Does it add expenses? Of course. Is it breaking the states? Hardly.
This^^Here's the similar report for California:
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersffec
The annual cost per household is noted as being significantly higher than in Arizona: $1,183 vs. $700.
So says the guy who is about as far away from the southern border as you can be and still be in the continental US. And of the citations at the end of your article the most recent were 2006, the oldest was 2002. here is an idea, instead of looking on the Google for your facts, move to Uvalde, Texas and experience it first hand. There is a 200 acre ranch about 6-7 miles from my Aunt and Uncles. I give you under a year before you become xenophobic, fear mongered, and yes, "racist".Yeah, and none of these "studies" take into account any of the value added by illegal immigrants in cost savings, taxes paid in forms other than income taxes (which many illegals actually pay anyway), or the economic growth that illegals bring to the states.
But all of this is completely irrelevant. The illegal immigration problem will only be solved by national reform that rationalizes the immigration system and provides a path to citizenship to those who are already here. Rick Perry can send all the bills he wants to the feds, the states can pass stupid little laws that drive up their construction and farming costs but are never enforced anyway, and Bachmann can draw up detailed schematics for the Great Wall of the Southwest until kingdom comes. But they are all empty, useless, foolish gestures. The only way to solve the problem is to support common sense reform. Xenophobia, fear mongering, and yes, racism, are not the solution.
Here is a breakdown of many of the "facts" that are often thrown around about illegal immigration.
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/cost-of-illegal-immigrants/
1. if people are here illegally and need emergency treatment, we have to help themgmart, the thing I like about you is that you typically have an abundance of common sense. Do you really think militarizing the entire southern border of the United States, letting illegals die outside the emergency rooms because giving them care is illegal, and attempting the mass deportation of tens of millions of people will ever work? Or that a majority of the American people will ever accept it? The only way illegal immigration will destroy this country is if a significant majority continue to cling to either the insane strategies of blanket immunity or mass deportation.
i believe this is the sensible reply BiB is looking for. i agree with all of it.1. if people are here illegally and need emergency treatment, we have to help them
2. As soon as they are better they need to be sent back wherever they came from
3. We have immigration laws that should be either obeyed or repealed
4. We are a nation of immigrants. Fine. That was then, this is now. We already have more people than we need.
5. Illegals cost us more than they supply via taxes
6. We need a workable seasonable guest worker program. Come here legally, work in your seasonal job, make your money, go back and live very well until next season, repeat.
No, he is saying there is no problem or that it is highly exaggerated. No one is saying kick in doors, round em up at Wal Mart by the bus load, or let them die outside the emergency room. That is hyperbolic crap that we expect from the left. I'm all for sensible approaches but the problem is that the feds are poo pooing their responsibility will claiming they are the only ones who can act on the issue. All we are saying is "Act dammit!"i believe this is the sensible reply BiB is looking for. i agree with all of it.
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20110828/news/110829723?tc=arDriven out of Tuscaloosa
The fear of deportation and separation from family has many of Tuscaloosa's illegal immigrants heading to other states, Mexico
now that i am sober i will answer your question. i still agree with everything bamaro said. to add a couple points:gmart, the thing I like about you is that you typically have an abundance of common sense. Do you really think militarizing the entire southern border of the United States, letting illegals die outside the emergency rooms because giving them care is illegal, and attempting the mass deportation of tens of millions of people will ever work? Or that a majority of the American people will ever accept it? The only way illegal immigration will destroy this country is if a significant majority continue to cling to either the insane strategies of blanket immunity or mass deportation.
actually that is simple and would probably be the most effective strategy to implement. but let's not let a crisis go to waste. we should use them to roll back federal legislation on housing, energy and education within the state of alabama. oh and also earmark some funds for me to study the behavior of waves at gulf shores.We don't need fences or a militarized border although both could be effective in stopping the flow until a solution can be arrived at. Honestly, if employers would forced to hire legal workers this would solve itself. The folks here keep saying that they are leaving b/c of the "unfair discrimination" in the law. However, when I spoke to some I knew they were all headed to Joplin in look for....jobs. Well shazam!!! No job, no stay.
BIRMINGHAM, Alabama -- U.S. District Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn has decided to block Alabama's new immigration law for a month to give herself more time to rule on whether parts or all of the far-reaching law are constitutional.
It was set to go into effect Sept. 1.
The court announced the one-month preliminary injunction at 1:30 p.m. today and said the temporary stay is not based on the merits of the law. The injunction would be lifted prior to Sept. 29 if Blackburn issues her ruling in the case.
True...it said the following.Injunction was expected in this type of case, but it really doesn't say anything about the eventual outcome.
The court announced the one-month preliminary injunction at 1:30 p.m. today and said the temporary stay is not based on the merits of the law.
This simply isn't possible with the numbers we've been told. Upwards of 30 MILLION people? Where do people think our government will suddenly discover the level of planning and efficiency that would be required to pull something off?I'm not sayin gyou are, but there are many, many people saying we should round them up and deport them, by pretty much any means necessary. And I am not on the Left.
http://news.yahoo.com/obamas-uncle-held-immigration-authorities-222253327.htmlObama's uncle held by immigration authorities
President Barack Obama's uncle was stopped on suspicion of drunken driving in Massachusetts, told police he planned to arrange bail through the White House and is being held without bail by federal immigration officials, authorities said Monday.
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!
Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.