I'm excited because:Can we really draw that conclusion at this point? I hope he turns out to be just that, but I don’t think anyone can be absolutely sure right now. I’m curious—what exactly do those of you saying this find on his resume that is so impressive?
-- It's a different approach that has proven successful in at least three different major programs: The best HS football program in the country (IMG), Notre Dame and Indiana.
-- Two of those programs (ND and IU) showed an immediate turnaround in on-field record after Ballou arrived.
-- One of those programs, IU, isn't exactly a football powerhouse.
-- Rhea brings a data-based approach, with PhD brainpower behind it, that Ballou executes to perfection.
-- The cool thing about basing your decisions on data is that you're not wedded to any given approach....you're wedded to the evidence. So as the data / evidence change and evolve over time, so does your approach.
-- Significant evidence over a period of 2-3 years (on-field performance and injuries) indicates that we needed a new approach, and there is no evidence that Cochran's approach was evolving.
I'm not worried about the lack of Cochran-esque demonstrativeness. There are lots of ways to motivate, only one of which is Eveready Battery Bunny-like enthusiasm, arm-waving and yelling. Ballou clearly communicates with enough fire to get his point across, and has been really successful over a long period of time. I like that he will be himself, not Scott Cochran, Part Deux.
Two caveats:
First, none of that means Cochran had become dead weight. He was one of the rocks on which Saban built his culture. He also did a great job developing relationships with players. Those relationships take time, and we may have a transfer or two because he's not there to be Father Confessor to an 18-22 year old world class athlete experiencing frustration for the first time in his sporting career.
Second, for all his positive contributions, Scott Cochran was far from the only reason for Alabama's run from 2008 to 2018. Likewise, I have no illusions that the pairing of Rhea and Ballou was the sole reason both Notre Dame and IU turned around so quickly on the field after their arrival. But there's no doubt that all of them played major roles at their respective programs.
Correction: Rhea and Ballou were together at IMG and IU, but not at ND.
Final question in return: If Rhea / Ballou isn't a great hire, who would have been better?
Last edited: