For the upteenth time, winning at Ohio and Wake Forest is something few men are able to do.
For the upteenth time, I've had conversations with NFL personnel people who sing the praises of what Jim Grobe can do as a coach.
I don't know what people don't like about him. This search has somehow transformed from who we think can help us win to who we think is going to put the most high-flying offense on the field. That's not the same thing.
What many would be surprised to learn is that if Mike Price had turned us down in 2003, we might have ended up with Jim Grobe then -- and that was before he ever won an ACC championship. In fact, had we not tried to find a coach to develop a passing offense around Croyle, we might have looked to Grobe because of his experience with the flex- and spread-option offenses.
The only real difference between Grobe's offense and Rodriguez's offense, from a theoretical standpoint, is the talent. WVU has twice the talent Wake has, if that.
I may be about to step in it with this statement, but I don't believe most of the people who are criticizing Grobe have seen his teams play enough to really have the basis to comment on him. They've taken a look at the raw W-L numbers and that's as far as it goes. Or, the GaTech game was the first time they'd actually seen Wake play.
Especially given the Stallings comparison, it's not logical to say he's a bad coach -- or that Alabama could "do a lot better." Put the rest of the field at Ohio and Wake and see how they do; it could surprise us all.